SWATANTER KUMAR, G.S.SISTANI
COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION – Appellant
Versus
GULSHAN BAJWA – Respondent
SWATANTER KUMAR, J.
( 1 ) THE meaning of the expression 'contempt' in normal parlance is an act of state of despising, the conduct that defies the authority or dignity of a court. It is so because such conduct interferes with the administration of justice and is liable to be punished. Even in its liberal construction, it conveys a strong feeling of combined dislike and lack of respect. In order to protect the dignity of Court and ensure proper administration of justice, the legislature has enacted 'the Contempt of Courts Act', which deals with the various situations and varied conduct of parties, counsel or any person to ensure that the orders of the court are implemented and administration of justice is not hampered. Every citizen has a Fundamental Right of personal liberty and freedom of expression. Despite such Right, this Act granted jurisdiction to the court to punish for contemptuous behaviour made in writing or verbally. While reasonably protecting these rights and circumventing the court's jurisdiction to punish for contempt, the initial Contempt of Courts Act, 1926 was replaced by the 1971 Act. The Legislature intended to caution the courts that even where prima facie a c
Referred to : Murray and Co. v. Ashok Kr. Newatia
Bank of India vs. Vijay Transport
Dhananjay Sharma v. State of Haryana
Aligarh Municipal Board vs. Ekka Tonga Mazdoor Union
Prem Soran, Addl. Munsif vs. Judicial Magistrate
Court of its own motion vs. B.D.Kaushik and Ors
Bank of India vs. Vijay Transport
Amar Nath vs. Joginder Singh and Ors
Dhananjay Sharma vs. State of Haryana and Ors
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.