SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
Bhupinder Singh Patel – Appellant
Versus
CBI – Respondent
2. On 5-11 -2003, M/s. Dilip Singh Judeo (accused No. 1), the then Union Minister of State for Environment and Forests allegedly received illegal gratification in the sum of Rs. nine lacs in the presence of his Additional Private Secretary (APS), Shri Natwar Rateria (accused No. 2) from one Shri Bhupinder Singh Patel alias Rahul (accused No. 3) as consideration for future 'favours' with regard to certain mining projects in the States of Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand and Orissa. The said incident had been secretly video recorded by accused No. 3 and one Shri Arvind Vijaymohan (accused No. 4) acquainted with accused No. 3 who arranged for the video recording equipment. This incident came to be widely reported and publicized in print and visual media.
3. After conducting a preliminary enquiry, the respondent registered a case against the said accus
Soma Chakravarty v. State through CBI (2007) 5 SCC 403 : 2007 Cri LJ 3257
State of Orissa v. Debendra Nath Padhi (2005) 1 SCC 568 : AIR 2005 SC 359
R. Balakrishna Pillai v. State of Kerala (2003) 9 SCC 700 : AIR 2004 SC 1012
State (Delhi Admn.) v. V.C. Shukla
Om Wati (Smt) and Anr. v. State through Delhi Admn. and Ors. (2001) 4 SCC 333 : 2001 Cri LJ 1723
Sharad Yadav and Ors. v. Union of India (UOI) and Ann
Suresh Chandra Bahri v. State of Bihar
Niranjan Singh Karam Singh Punjabi
Sewak Ram Sobhani v. R. K. Karanjivani
Union of India v. Prafulla Kumar Samal and Anr. AIR 1979 SC 366
Shri Ram v. The State of U. P.
NMMY Momin v. State of Maharashtra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.