BADAR DURREZ AHMED, V.K.JAIN
Babita Pathak – Appellant
Versus
High Court of Delhi – Respondent
Badar Durrez Ahmed, J.
1. These writ petitions concern the Delhi Judicial Service Examination 2010. The High Court of Delhi (Respondent No.1) had issued a notification dated 26.10.2009 with regard to the holding of the Delhi Judicial Service Examination in respect of 60 vacancies. 27 vacancies were for the General category, 14 vacancies were for the Scheduled Caste category, 14 were for the Scheduled Tribes category and 5 vacancies were reserved for the physically handicapped persons (blind / low vision). It may be pointed out at this stage itself that out of these five vacancies, which were reserved for physically handicapped persons, one vacancy was carried forward and advertised for the fifth time, one vacancy was carried forward and advertised for the third time, two vacancies were carried forward and advertised for the second time and one vacancy was advertised for the first time.
2. The main controversy is with regard to the manner in which the five vacancies for the physically handicapped persons are to be filled. The petitioners in these writ petitions are all persons belonging to the General category. In the final result that was declared for the said DJS Examin
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.