VALMIKI J.MEHTA
Justice Udai Krishna Dhaon – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
Valmiki J. Mehta, J.
1. By this writ petition, the petitioner who is a retired Judge of the Allahabad High Court (who was also subsequently appointed as Chairman of the Railway Claims Tribunal), seeks the relief for being appointed as a Member (Judicial) of National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) on the ground that his name appears at serial no.5 in the select list of candidates who were to be appointed.
2. I may at the outset itself note that even as per para 2.8 of the writ petition, the select list of five candidates of which petitioner was placed at serial no.5 was with respect to two vacancies of Member (Judicial) in NCDRC pursuant to the notification dated 21.7.2011.
3. The case of the petitioner is that out of five candidates in the select list, the first two candidates, namely, Justice J. M. Malik (Retd.) and Justice K.S. Chaudhary (Retd.) joined. As per the petitioner, against a subsequent vacancy, Justice Ajit Bharihoke (a retired Judge of this Court) was asked to join inasmuch as the third person in the select list did not accept the offer of appointment. Petitioner claims that validity of the panel is one year in terms of the subject notificat
Union of India and Anr. Vs. Bhaskarendu Datta Majumdar (2010) 9 SCC 38
Bijender Singh Vs. Govt. of NCT 2012 (190) DLT 340
Surinder Singh and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Ors. AIR 1998 SC 18
Rakhi Ray and Ors. Vs. High Court of Delhi and Ors. (2010) 2 SCC 637
Maninder Kaur Vs. Delhi High Court and Ors. (1995) 57 DLT 288 (FB).
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.