2014 Supreme(Del) 2848
J.R.MIDHA
Kusum Sharma & Ors. – Appellant
Versus
Mahinder Kumar Sharma – Respondent
Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant in FAO 369/1996 and CM No. 15083/2014 : Mr. Aseem Chandra, Mr. Santosh Tripathi, Advs. and Mr. Sunil Mittal, Amicus Curiac.
For the Respondent in FAO 369/1996 and CM No. 15083/2014:Mr. Rahul Sharma and Ms. Jyoti Dutt Sharma, Advocates.
For the Appellant in MAT.APP. 47/2005 : Ms. Ann Narula, Amicus Curiac.
For the Respondent in MAT.APP. 47/2005:Mr. Subhash, Advocate.
For the Appellant in FAO 297/ 1997 and CM No. 178/2009 : Mr. Rajiv K. Garg, Amicus Curiae.
For the Respondent in FAO 297/1997 and CM No. 178/2009:Ms. Vandana Khurana, Advocate.
For the Appellant in MAT.APP. 36/2012 and CM Nos. 7447-48/2012 :Dr. L.S. Chaudhary and Mr. Ajay Chandhary, Advocates.
For the Respondent in MAT.APP. 36/2012 and CM Nos. 7447-48/2012:Mr. Vijay Kasana, for Mr. Rajat Aneja, Advocates.
For the Appellant in MAT.APP. 64/2007, CM Nos. 12771 /2007, 4932/2010 and 19199/2012 : Ms. Ann Narula and Mr. kunal Aurora, Advs. along with appellant in person.
For the Respondent in MAT.APP. 64/2007, CM Nos. 12771/2007, 4932/2010 and 19199/ 2012:Mr. Ashish Dogra, Advocate.
For the Appellant in MAT.APP. 33/2010, CM Nos. 4727/2010 and 18975/2011 :Mr. Siddharth Pandit and Mr. Narender Sharma, Advocates.
For the Respondent in MAT.APP. 33/2010, CM Nos. 4727/2010 and 18975/2011:Mr. Deepak Khadaria, Advocate.
For the Appellant in MAT.APP. 35/2010 and CM Nos. 15081-82/2014:Ms. Bhanita Patawary and Ms. Richa Aggarwal, Advocates.
For the Respondent in MAT.APP. 35/2010 and CM Nos. 15081-82/2014:Mr. Malaya Chand and Mr. S.P. Mitra, Advocates.
For the Appellant in MAT.APP. 124/2010 and CM No. 20014/2010 :Mr. Hasan Anzar, Mr. Osama Suhail and Ms. Samama Suhail, Advocates.
For the Respondent in MAT.APP. 124/2010 and CM No. 20014/2010:Ms. Gitanjali Malviya, Ms. Sana-Ul-Haq and Mr. Purushendra Bharadwaj, Advocates.
For the Appellant in MAT.APP. 8/2013 :Mr. Suraj Bhan, Advocate.
For the Respondent in MAT.APP. 8/2013:Ms. Vandana Khurana, Advocate.
1. In all these appeals, the decree of divorce granted by the learned Trial Court to husband is under challenge by the wife. During the pendency of the appeals, the appellants are seeking to invoke Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act to claim permanent alimony. In MAT. APR 35/2010, FAO 369/1996, MAT. APR 47/2005, 33/2010, 8/2013 and FAO 297/1997, the appellants have filed application under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act. Let the reply to the said applications be filed within four weeks. In MAT. APP. 64/2007, 124/2010 and 36/2012, the appellants seek two weeks time to file the application under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act.
2. Let all the parties file their affidavits of assets, income and expenditure from the date of the marriage upto this date within two weeks. The affidavits shall contain all the particulars mentioned in para 7 and shall be accompanied with documents mentioned in para 8 of Puneet Kaur v. Inderjit Singh Sawhney, 183 (2011) DLT 403=III (2011) DMC 487. The affidavit shall also contain particulars of properties mentioned in Section 27 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The response to the affidavits be filed within a period of two weeks thereafter.
3. The Hindu
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
Back
