DELHI HIGH COURT
S.P. Garg, J.
Santoshanand Avdoot @ Ghanshyam Prashad & Anr. - Appellant
Versus
State - Resopndent
Crl. A. 443/1976 & Crl. A. 436/1976
Decided On : 14-08-2014
S.P. Garg, J.
1. The appellants – Santoshanand Avadhoot @ Ghan Shyam Prasad (A-1); Ram Janam Dwivedi @ Ranjan Dwivedi (A-2) and Sudevanand Avadhoot @ Misri Lal Yadav (A-3) impugn a judgment dated 28.10.1976 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No. 9/1976 arising out of RC 11/75/CIU/SPE/CBI by which they were held guilty for committing offences under Section 120 B (1) Indian Penal Code (in short ‘IPC’). A-1 and A-3 were also held guilty under Section 307 IPC and Section 4 (b) Explosive Substances Act 1908. By an order dated 01.11.1976, A-1 and A-3, were sentenced as under :
(i) Rigorous imprisonment (in short ‘RI’) for seven years under Sections 120B (1) read with Section 115 IPC.
(ii) RI for ten years under Section 307 IPC for the attempt to murder CJI.
(iii) RI for ten years under Section 307 IPC for the attempt to murder Sh. Ajoy Nath Ray.
(iv) RI for ten years under Section 307 IPC for the attempt to murder Jamadar Jai Nand.
(v) RI for ten years under Section 307 IPC for the attempt to murder driver Inder Singh.
(vi) RI for seven years under Section 4 (b), Explosive Substances Act, 1908. A-2 was awarded RI for four years under Section 120B(1) read with Section 115 of IPC.
2. The sentences enumerated at Nos. (ii) to (vi) were to operate concurrently but only after A-1 and A-3 had served out the sentence mentioned at No. (i).
(A) Facts in brief
3. The factual matrix in which the appellants came to be prosecuted and convicted has been set out in detail by the Trial Court. I need not, therefore, recapitulate the same all over again except to the extent it is necessary. Shorn of details, the prosecution case as reflected in the charge-sheet is as under :
4. In a macabre incident which took place on 20.03.1975 at about 04.15 P.M. the assailants threw two hand-grenades in the car in an attempt to murder Sh. A.N. Ray, the then Chief Justice of India (in short : CJI) when he was proceeding with his son Ajoy Nath Ray from the Supreme Court to his residence in a staff car bearing registration No. DL C 6431 driven by PW- Inder Singh. PW-Jai Nand, Security Officer / Jamadar was present inside the car in the front seat. The hand-grenades were thrown after the car had covered a distance of about 200 metres from gate – ‘A’ exclusively reserved for Supreme Court Judges at the intersection of Tilak Marg and Bhagwan Das Road when it pulled up there on account of STOP signal. The nefarious designs of the assailants did not yield any result and providentially the hand-grenades thrown inside the car did not explode. Apparently, the assailants failed to accomplish the dangerous mission. PW- Jai Nand who had seen an ‘individual’ throwing ‘something’ wrapped in a handkerchief inside the car through the window where CJI was sitting, questioned him as to what he was doing there.
Instead of giving reply / response, the assailant suddenly started running towards Bhagwan Dass Road. It prompted Jai Nand to get out of the car and chase the assailant shouting ‘pakro - pakro’. The culprit entered into a taxi parked nearby at Bhagwan Dass Road; came out of it immediately; fled towards Garhwal House; jumped over it; crossed its front gate and disappeared. SI Om Prakash, PW- Const.Jai Lal, PW-Ramji Lal and many others joined PW-Jai Nand to chase the assailant but in vain.
The police machinery swung into action promptly on getting information from Police Control Room. Insp.Sajjan Singh, SHO Tilak Marg Police Station along with his team of police personnel reached the spot after receiving the wireless message from SI Inder Singh. He made an unsuccessful search for the culprit and returned to the crime scene at about 05.10 P.M. He examined the spot of occurrence, prepared a rough sketch (Ex.P-106) of the crime scene and seized various articles. He lodged First Information Report after recording Jai Nand’s statement (Ex.P16). Two unexploded hand-grenades (Ex.A3 and Ex.A4) lying near the rear portion of the car, handkerchiefs (Ex.A5 and Ex.A6) were taken
A.B. Bhaskara Rao v. Inspector of Police, CBI, Vishakhapatnam
Ambika Prasad Thakur v. Ram Ekbal Raj
Arun Kumar Sharma v. State of Bihar
Babubhai v. State of Gujarat & Ors.
Chatter Singh v. State of M.P.
Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s. Sun Engineering Works (P) Ltd.
G.K. Dudani & Ors. v. S.D. Sharma & Ors.
Hanumant v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Hazara Singh v. Jinder Singh & Ors.
Jamal Ahmad & ors. v. State of U.P.
Jesu Asir Singh & ors. v. State through Inspector of Police
Kailash Gour & ors. v. State of Assam
Karunakaran v. State of Tamil Nadu
Kehar Singh & Ors. v. State (Delhi Admn.)
Major E.G. Barsay v. State of Bombay
Mohd. Aman, Babu Khan & anr. v. State of Rajasthan, 1997 (10) SCC 44 [Paras 19
Mrinal Das and ors. v. The State of Tripura
Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Gurnam Kaur
Narayan Chetanram Chaudhary & anr. v. State of Maharastra
Narinder Singh v. Surjit Singh
Phula Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh
Sarwan Singh Rattan Singh v. State of Punjab
Sharad Birdhi Chand v. State of Maharashtra, 1984 (4) SCC 116 [Paras 19
Sheshanna v. The State of Maharashtra
Shyam Babu and Others v. State of Haryana
Spencer & Company Ltd. & Anr. v. Vishwadarshan Distributors Pvt. Ltd. & Others
Sriniwas Mull Bairoliya & Anr. v. Emperor
State (NCT of Delhi) v. Navjot Sandhu @ Afsan Guru
State of Gujarat v. Mohammad Atik
State of T.N. v. Nalini & Ors.
State of U.P. v. M.K. Anthony’
Sudevanand v. State, 2012 (3) SCC 387 : Crl. A. No. 174/2012
Sukhvinder Singh and Ors. v. State of Punjab
Sunil Kumar Sambhudayal Gupta and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra
Tanviben Pankaj Kumar Divetia v. State of Gujarat
Tribhuvan Nath v. State of Maharastra
Union of India (UOI) & Ors. v. Dhanwanti Devi & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.