SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Del) 181

NAVIN CHAWLA
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Mago Construction Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Jaswinder Singh, Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Advs.
For the Respondent:Mr. Rakesh Saini, Adv. along with Mr. Ravi Tej Singh Maggo, Authorized signatory of respondent company

JUDGMENT :

NAVIN CHAWLA, J.

1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 12.05.2018 passed by the Sole Arbitrator adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the Contract Agreement No.CEDZ/40 OF 2009-10: Construction of Building for PLI (OPS) at Delhi Cantt.

2. The Arbitrator has carved out the basic facts in relation to the Contract in paragraph 15 of the Award, which is reproduced hereunder:

“15. BRIEF PARTICULARS OF THE CASE.

a. CA No and Name of Work

CEDZ/40 of 2009-10 CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDING FOR PLI (OPS) AT DELHI CANTT. DELHI

b. Date of tender Receipt

20th Nov 2009

c. Date of Acceptance

16th Dec 2009

d. Amount of Contract

: 5,88,99,749.95

e. Date of Commencement

01st Jan 2010

f. Date of Stipulated Completion

31st March 2011

g. First Extension of time

30th Dec 2011, Granted on : 30th A





























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top