JYOTI SINGH
Mohan Steels Limited – Appellant
Versus
Steel Authority Of India (Sail) – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
JYOTI SINGH, J.
1. Present petition had been filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’) seeking to set aside the Award dated 01.07.2015 passed by the Sole Arbitrator as also seeking a declaration that the recovery made by the respondent is illegal and arbitrary.
2. Brief facts germane to the present petition are that the petitioner was appointed as a Conversion Agent for the first time in the year 2006 by the respondent which is a Government Company for conversion of TMT Bars. A contract was entered into for a period of three years i.e. from 2006 till 2009 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Contract-I’) Under Contract-I, conversion charges payable to the petitioner were to be increased @ 2% every year. Consequently, the respondent revised the conversion charges for the year 2007-2008 vide letter dated 17.03.2007 as well as for the year 2008-2009 vide its letter dated 30.05.2008 and accordingly reimbursed the money at increased rate every year till the conclusion of Contract-I.
3. On 05.02.2009, petitioner entered
Alopi Parshad & Sons Ltd. v. Union of India
Associate Builders vs. Delhi Development Authority (2015) 3 SCC 49
Bank of India and Anr. V. K. Mohandas and Ors. (2009) 5 SCC 313
Chandi Prasad Uniyal v. State of Uttarakhand (2012) 8 SCC 417
Jivarajbhai Ujamshi Sheth v. Chintamanrao Balaji
McDermott International Inc. v. Burn Standard Co. Ltd.
Michigan Rubber (India) Ltd. v. State of Karnataka (2012) 8 SCC 216
MSK Projects (I) (JV) Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan
Pure Helium India (P) Ltd. v. Oil and Natural Gas Commission
Renusagar Power Co. Ltd. v. General Electric Co.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.