RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, ASHA MENON
Savita Anand – Appellant
Versus
Krishna Sain – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Asha Menon, J. - The present appeal has been filed by the plaintiff before the learned Single Judge, being aggrieved by the dismissal of her suit vide the impugned judgement dated 18th July, 2018.
2. The suit was filed by Smt. Savita Anand, (hereinafter referred to as the "appellant") for partition and permanent injunction against three defendants, namely, her mother Smt.Krishna Sain (who has since expired during the pendency of the appeal and will be referred to for convenience as ''D1''), her sister Smt.Sarita Mullick (hereinafter referred to as ''D2'') and her brother Sh.Sanjeev Sain (hereinafter referred to as ''D3''). Partition was sought of property bearing number E-27, Block No. B-1 Extension, Mohan Co-operative Industrial Estate, New Delhi, ad measuring 1422.81 sq. yds (for short, "suit property").
BACKGROUND FACTS
3. Briefly stated the case of the appellant was that the suit property belonged to her father late Yashpal Sain and as one of his legal heirs, she was entitled to 1/4th share in the said property, upon the demise of her father. The case set out in the plaint was that late Yashpal Sain had come to India from Lahore, Pakistan on Partition of the country and
Bristol and West Building Society vs. Mothew
Marcel Martins vs. M. Printer and others
RBI vs. Jayantilal N Mistry & Others
Swayam Sidha Cooperative Group Housing Society vs. Financial Commissioner Delhi and Others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.