IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, Asha Menon, JJ.
Purshotam Behl - Appellant
Versus
Union Of India & Ors. - Respondent
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 2733 of 2019, 2741 of 2019, 2743 of 2019, 3096 of 2019, 3632 of 2019, 4781 of 2019; Civil Miscellaneous No. 50728 of 2019, 6263 of 2020, 50732 of 2019, 3405 of 2020, 6264 of 2020, 50731 of 2019, 3406 of 2020, 4349 of 2020, 6265 of 2020, 3404 of 2020, 3408 of 2020, 50727 of 2019
Decided On : 28-08-2020
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge related to land acquisition process (Para 1 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. arguments on final determination and possession issue (Para 2 , 8 , 18) |
| 3. court's reasoning on legislative interpretation (Para 14 , 22 , 37) |
| 4. single composite award concept upheld (Para 28 , 49) |
| 5. order for possession and rights of petitioners upheld (Para 69 , 71) |
JUDGMENT
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J. - The challenge in all these petitions, by different/some of the owners of land, total ad-measuring 5.6204 hectares or 13.89 acres, in the revenue estate of village Malikpur Kohi @ Rangpuri, Notification of intention of acquisition inter alia whereof, under Section 3A of the National Highway Act, 1956 (NH Act) was issued on 12th January, 2018, is with respect to the determination dated 16th January, 2019, under Section 3G of the NH Act, of the amount payable as compensation for acquisition and calling upon the petitioners to deliver possession of the land within 60 days, failing which physical possession was threatened to be taken with assistance of police force.
2. It was the contention of the counsel for the petitioner on 19th March, 2019 when W.P.(C) No.2733/2019 came up before the Court for admission / consideration, that the determination under Section 3G of the NH Act was not a final determination, as required to be under the NH Act, inasmuch as the said determination was for land only and with respect to the determination of the claim of the petitioner for structures over the said land, it was stated in the determination dated 16th January, 2019, that another determination shall be done. It was further the contention of the counsel for the petitioner that till there is final determination of the claims of the petitioner, both for land and structure and till the amount so determined is not deposited, possession of the land, under Section 3E of the NH Act could not be taken. Finding prima facie merit therein, while issuing notice of the petition, status quo qua possession of the land and structures thereon was ordered to be maintained. Subsequently, on other petitions being listed, the same order followed.
3. Pleadings in the petitions stood completed but the hearing of the petitions was being deferred on account of prevalent Covid-19 pandemic. The respondents National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) filed applications for early virtual hearing of the petitions contending that owing to the interim order of this Court in these petitions, construction / completion of the proposed Dwarka Expressway Highway was held up and further informing that supplementary declaration with respect to compensation for superstructures also stood published on 4th October, 2019. The said applications for early hearing were allowed and the petitions posted for hearing on 7th August, 2020.
4. The counsel for the petitioner in W.P.(C) No.3096/2019, the counsel for the petitioners in W.P.(C) No.2733/2019, 2741/2019, 2743/2019 & 4781/2019, the counsel for the petitioner in W.P.(C) No.3632/2019 and the senior counsel for the respondents NHAI were heard on 7th August, 2020; the counsel for the Competent Authority, Land Acquisition of the NHAI (CALA) supported the arguments of the senior counsel for the NHAI, and orders/judgments on the petitions were reserved.
5. Though the counsels for the petitioner in W.P.(C) No.3096/2019 and the petitioner in W.P.(C) No.3632/2019 argued with reference to the facts of their respective petitions but since the undisputed facts are the same, it is expedient to hereinafter refer to the pages, annexures and dates from the lead petition, being W.P.(C) No.2733/2019.
6. As aforesaid, Notification dated 12th January, 2018 under Section 3(a) of the NH Act, stating that the land mentioned in the schedule thereto was required for building, maintenance, management and operation of proposed Dwarka Expressway on stretch of land from Km.0.000 to Km.1.500 in the district New Delhi in the State of Delhi and declaring intention to acquire such land, and in
Ambya Kalya Mhatre Vs. The State of Maharashtra
Bai Malimabu Vs. State of Gujarat
Bijendra Nath Srivastava Vs. Mayank Srivastava
Chaturbhuj Panda Vs. Collector, Raigarh
Competent Authority Vs. Barangore Jute Factory
Fruit and Vegetable Merchants Union Vs. Delhi Improvement Trust
Indian Performing Rights Society Ltd. Vs. Sanjay Dalia
M.K. Shah Engineers & Contractors Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Manshukhbhai Dhamjibhai Patel Vs. State of Gujarat
Mohamadsarif Hakimji Chippa Vs. State of Gujarat
Mrinalini Roy Ratna Prova Mondal Vs. State of West Bengal
Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay Vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation
Nagpur Improvement Trust Vs. Vithal Rao
National Textile Corporation Ltd. Vs. Nareshkumar Badrikumar Jagad
State of Punjab Vs. Sharan Pal Singh
Union of India Vs. Tarsem Singh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.