IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
J.R. MIDHA, J.
United Lindia Insurance Co Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Shakuntala & Ors - Respondents
MAC.APP. 135 of 2020 & CM APPL. 8821 of 2020
Decided On : 18-06-2021
Accident - Award - Challenged - Minimum wages income of deceased - Deceased was aged 20 years at the time of accident and was survived by his parents who claimed compensation - Deceased was a vegetable seller and according to the respondents No. 1 and 2, the deceased was earning Rs.12,000/- per month.
Finding of the court: In the present case minimum wages of Delhi at the relevant time were Rs.9,724/- per month which is taken as the income of the deceased instead of Rs.12,000/- per month taken by the Claims Tribunal - Income of deceased as Rs.9,724/- per month, adding 40% towards future prospects, deducting 50% towards the personal expenses and applying the multiplier of 18, the loss of dependency is computed as Rs.14,71,000/- (Rs.14,70,268.80 rounded of) Adding the non-pecuniary compensation as awarded by the Claims Tribunal, the total compensation is computed as Rs.16,81,000/-.
Result: Appeal is allowed
JUDGMENT :
1. The petitioner has challenged the award dated 13th November, 2019 of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.20,24,400/- has been awarded to the claimants/respondents No.1 and 2.
2. The accident dated 21st October, 2016 resulted in the death of Arjun. The deceased was aged 20 years at the time of accident and was survived by his parents who claimed compensation. The deceased was a vegetable seller and according to the respondents No. 1 and 2, the deceased was earning Rs.12,000/- per month.
3. The Claims Tribunal took the income of the deceased as Rs.12,000/- per month, added 40% towards future prospects, deducted 50% towards personal expenses and applied the multiplier of 18 to compute the loss of dependency as Rs.18,14,400/-. The Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.1,00,000/- (Rs.50,000/- each) towards loss of love and affection, Rs.80,000/- (Rs.40,000/- each) towards loss of consortium, Rs.15,000/- towards loss to the estate and Rs.15,000/- towards funeral expenses. Total compensation awarded is Rs.20,24,400/-.
4. Learned counsel for the appellant urged at the time of the hearing that minimum wages of Rs.6,814.81 as applicable in U.P. at the relevant time be taken into consideration to compute the compensation as the deceased was resident of U.P. Learned counsel for respondents No.1 and 2 urged at the time of hearing that the deceased was working at Delhi and therefore, the minimum wages of Rs.9,724/- per month of Delhi be taken into consideration.
5. This Court is of the view that in the absence of any documentary proof of income with respect to the occupation and income of the deceased, the Claims Tribunal ought to have taken the minimum wages of Delhi as the income of the deceased. In the present case, the minimum wages of Delhi at the relevant time were Rs.9,724/- per month which is taken as the income of the deceased instead of Rs.12,000/- per month taken by the Claims Tribunal.
6. Taking the income of the deceased as Rs.9,724/- per month, adding 40% towards future prospects, deducting 50% towards the personal expenses and applying the multiplier of 18, the loss of dependency is computed as Rs.14,71,000/- (Rs.14,70,268.80 rounded of) Adding the non-pecuniary compensation as awarded by the Claims Tribunal, the total compensation is computed as Rs.16,81,000/-.
7. The appeal is allowed and the compensation amount awarded by the Claims Tribunal is reduced from Rs.20,24,400/- to Rs.16,81,000/- along with interest @ 9% p.a. from the date of filing of DAR i.e. 09th January, 2017. Pending application is disposed of.
8. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant has deposited Rs.21,24,793/- in compliance of this Court order dated 04th March, 2020.
9. According to the calculation by the Accounts Officer of this Court, the compensation amount of Rs.16,81,000/- along with interest @ 9% per annum upto the date of the deposit is computed as Rs.22,41,169.61. As such, the balance amount of Rs.1,16,376.91 is liable to be deposited by the appellant. The appellant is therefore directed to deposit Rs.1,17,000/- (Rs.1,16,376.91 rounded of) with DSLSA within four weeks.
10. The details passbooks of savings bank accounts of respondents No.1 and 2 along with necessary endorsement from the Bank are in the Lower Court Record at page numbers (handwritten) 357 to 387. The particulars of the bank accounts of respondents No.1 and 2 are as under: -
(i) Shakuntala @ Shakuntla (Respondent No. 1)
A/c No. 23540100025917 Bank- Bank of Baroda, Soodanpur, Distt. Bareilly Branch (Address: Soodanpur , Vill & Post Karghena , Distt. Bareilly , Uttar Pradesh - 243001) IFSC Code - BARB0SOODAN
(ii) Pappu (Respondent No.2)
A/c No.23540100025914
Bank- Bank of Baroda, Soodanpur, Distt. Bareilly Branch (Address: Soodanpur , Vill & Post Karghena , Distt. Bareilly , Uttar Pradesh - 243001) IFSC Code - BARB0SOODAN
11. The Registrar General of this Court is directed to transfer the FDR of Rs.21,24,793/- along with interest to DSLSA within three weeks whereu
SupremeToday
Motor Accident - Death - Award modified - Absence of any documentary proof of income of deceased, Claims Tribunal ought to have taken minimum wages as income of deceased - Compensation awarded by Cla....
Compensation awarded in wrongful death cases must be substantiated by documented evidence of income and adhere to statutory guidelines while considering future prospects.
The Court upheld the compensation awarded by the Claims Tribunal, considering various factors such as the deceased's income, future prospects, and additional expenses, and found it just, fair, and re....
Calculation of pecuniary compensation in motor accident claims considering minimum wages, dependency, and application of the multiplier.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.