SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1963

NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Shanti Devi – Appellant
Versus
Siddharth Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Bhanu Prakash Verma
For the Respondent: Chanderdeep Singh Jodha

JUDGMENT :

Narendra Singh Dhaddha, J.

1. Instant appeal has been preferred by the appellants- claimant Nos.1, 4 and 5 (for short 'the claimants') dissatisfied with the judgment and award dated 30.03.2018 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Dausa (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal') in Claim Case No. -B.T. No. 147/2017(375/2013), whereby an amount of Rs.6,75,608/- alongwith interest @ 7% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition was awarded as compensation in favour of the claimants.

2. Learned counsel for the claimants submits that the Tribunal wrongly assessed the income of deceased as Rs.4316/- per month. Learned counsel for the claimants also submits that deceased-Chatrapal @ Chitar Pal used to build flats and earned Rs.15,000/- per month. Claimant-Smt. Shanti Devi had clearly stated in her evidence that deceased was earning Rs.15,000/- per month. No evidence in rebuttal was adduced by the non- claimants. So, income of the deceased be calculated as Rs.15,000/- per month. Alternatively, learned counsel for the claimants also submits that at that time, minimum wages was Rs.166/- per day. The Tribunal had calculated income for 26 days, whereas it should be f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top