SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 435

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Asha Menon, J.
JS & ANR. - Petitioners
Versus
Central Adoption Resource Authority & Anr. - Respondents
W.P. (C) 3187 of 2021, CM APPL.9662 of 2021
Decided On : 26-07-2021

Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Samar Bansal, Mr. Kartik Nagarkatti, Ms.Devahuti Pathak, Mr. Sachin Mishra, Mr. Aman Vishal, Ms.Harsheen Madan Palli, Advocates
For the Respondent:Ms. Biji Rajesh, Advocate, Mr. Arnav Kumar, Senior Panel Counsel

Point of Law : Procedure for inter-country adoption of an orphan or abandoned or surrendered child - Required Certificate of Adoption is issued by Registrar General of this Court with photographs of minor child and her adoptive parents, copy/duplicate of which shall be placed on this file. Case maintained permanently.

Headnote:

Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 - Sections 58 and 59(3) - Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Adoption Regulations, 2017 - Regulation 4(a) - Model Guidelines for Foster Care, 2016 - Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Model Rules, 2016 - Rule 44(v) - Procedure for adoption by Indian prospective adoptive parents living in India - Child Welfare Committee - No Objection Certificate – Seeking directions to Central Adoption Resource Authority (“CARA”) to issue a ‘No Objection Certificate’ (“NOC”) to them, which would enable them to take their “adopted child”, above-said minor, to United States of America (USA). Directions have also been sought to Union of India (“UOI”) for issuance of a passport to minor mentioning petitioners as her parents.

Finding of the court : No doubt, petitioners have been struggling, but they have only themselves to blame. CARA cannot be blamed for sticking to the Rules. The parties being Christians could not have executed an Adoption Deed under the HAMA. There is no court order declaring the minor to be the adopted child of the petitioners - Court has declared that the minor is the adopted child of the petitioners, CARA is directed to issue the requisite NOC. It is further directed that CARA shall not insist on compliance of provisions of Section 59(3) in the JJ Act dealing with NRIs or OCIs. Additionally, CARA shall also ensure that for a period of two years, an authorized agency, recognized by it for this purpose, submits the Home Study Reports at quarterly and half yearly intervals to CARA - CARA is directed to ensure that all persons working in or with Child-line and CCIs, are made fully aware of the adoption process so that nobody is misguided

Result : Petition is disposed of

JUDGMENT :

ASHA MENON, J.

[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]

1. The petition has been filed by Mr.JS and Mrs.MS, who describe themselves as the adoptive parents of a minor named JJS, seeking directions to the Central Adoption Resource Authority (“CARA”, for short) to issue a ‘No Objection Certificate’ (“NOC”, for short) to them, which would enable them to take their “adopted child”, the above-said minor, to the United States of America (USA). Directions have also been sought to Union of India (“UOI”, for short) for issuance of a passport to the minor mentioning the petitioners as her parents.

2. This case reflects how easily it is possible to set at naught the law intended to protect the welfare, well-being and the rights of the minors. A complete go by has been given to the provisions of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, (“JJ Act”, for short), whether of 2015 or of 2000.

3. After having so carelessly flouted the law of this land, a plea of humanitarian concerns is flashed before the court, expecting the court to discharge the burden of undoing the wrongs and simultaneously exonerating the wrongdoers!

4. Child trafficking is a pernicious practice that the State has sought to address by various legislative means. Since trafficking occurs also for the purpose of adoption, in addition to all other reasons, actions, internationally and nationally, have been taken, to prevent it happening, by prescribing the method and process for adopting a child. Despite that, people, who are well educated, circumvent all such provisions for their private gain.

5. The JJ Act, as also the Adoption Regulations, 2017, notified by the UOI on 4th January, 2017 and which came into force w.e.f 16th January, 2017, and before that, the CARA Guidelines issued in the light of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Lakshmi Kant Pandey v. Union of India (1984) 2 SCC 244, were all aimed at ensuring that the sourcing of the child is known and no trafficking occurs during adoption, particularly international adoptions. These essentially follow the Hague Convention on Protection of Children and Co-operation in respect of Inter-country Adoption, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as the “Hague Convention”), in cases of foreign adoptions. The Hague Convention seeks to also ensure that the adopted child is not left in the lurch in a foreign land, in the event the adoption does not work out or subsequently, some problems arise.

6. The CARA has been set up as the Central Agency to regulate adoption within the country and facilitate international adoption as per the recommendation of the Hague Convention. CARA is the National Agency as defined in the JJ Act. There are State Adoption Resource Agencies (“SARA”, for short) also defined in JJ Act. Their counterparts have been set up by the respective governments in several other countries and it is through them that CARA ensures that children, who are adopted from this country, are well taken care of. As required under the Hague Convention, CARA has recognized certain agencies to facilitate “in-country” and “inter-country adoption”.

7. The Guidelines/Rules provide that before adoption, the Child Welfare Committee (“CWC”, for short) has to be satisfied that the child is fit for adoption [Regulation 4(a) of the Adoption Regulations, 2017]. The fitness for adoption would be on account of the child being an orphan or having been abandoned or surrendered. In the case of surrender, the CWC is required to assure itself that the biological parents have willingly surrendered the child and for good reason. When the CWC is determining the fitness of an abandoned child, they are obligated to ensure that a proper inquiry and search for the biological parents is made. If none is traceable, then such a child is also declared fit for adoption. Pending adoption, the CWC may authorize any fit institution, fit person or Foster parent to take custody/charge of the child. In some cases, pre-adoption foster care is given to the prospective adop

                Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                1
                2
                3
                4
                5
                6
                7
                8
                9
                10
                11
                SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                supreme today icon
                logo-black

                An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                Please visit our Training & Support
                Center or Contact Us for assistance

                qr

                Scan Me!

                India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                whatsapp-icon Back to top