IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, C. Hari Shankar, JJ.
Polytech Trade Foundation - Petitioner
Versus
Union Of India And Ors. - Respondents
W.P.(C) 3029 of 2020 and CM 10998, 11044, 11045, 11046, 11047, 12389, 18969, 18970 of 2020, W.P.(C) 4184 of 2020 & C.M. Nos. 23827, 23967, 23968, 16043 of 2021 & 16044 of 2021, W.P.(C) 3171, 3195, 4349, 4485, 5532, 5675, 7031 of 2020 and CM APPL. 11027, 11336, 15657-658, 16173, 19921, 20533, 26172 of 2020, W.P.(C) 9819, 3649 of 2020 and CM No. 8006, 11077 of 2021, W.P.(C) 10142, 3561, 4185, 4186, 8406, 9066, 9067, 9068, 9069, 9070 of 2020 & 2707 of 2021
Decided On : 10-08-2021
Constitution of India - Article 226 – Writ of mandamus - Whether the above noted official Orders, Circulars and Advisories entitle the petitioners to a mandamus to CFSs, ICDs and shipping lines not to charge any penal charges from the petitioners, by whatever name called, for the delay in clearing the petitioners’ containers from the ICDs and CFSs and returning the containers to the shipping lines, beyond the “free days” provided by the CFSs, ICDs and shipping lines or direction to Container Freight Stations, Inland Container Depots and shipping lines/shipping companies/shipping carriers (whether registered in India or not) directing them to refund all such amounts that they have collected from various importers including petitioner herein as storage charges, lease rentals and license fees related charges, demurrages, detention charges, ground rent, dwell time charges, anchorage charges and any other penal charges or charges of such nature - or any appropriate writ, order or direction to Container Freight Stations, inland Container Depots and piping lines/shipping companies/shipping carriers (whether registered India or not) directing them to levy tariffs (on non- penal charges) as were applicable to respective importers as on March 21, 2020 with regards to such charges which are not penal in nature.
Finding of the Court : Issues involving disputed questions of fact, not amenable to adjudication under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. It is not open to the Court - just as it was not open to the executive authorities - to approach the matter solely from the point of view of the importers or exporters, unmindful of the difficulties which were faced by the ICDs and CFSs during the lockdown, and the constraints under which they operated. Equity inherently inheres in the exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226, and Court are not persuaded to hold that the equities of the present case are entirely in favour of the petitioner importers/exporters, and to the prejudice of the respondent ICDs/CFSs/shipping lines, as would warrant our inference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
Result: petitions disposed of.
JUDGMENT :
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
1. Between the time when imported goods land on Indian soil, and the Customs authorities release them from their charge so that they become part of the “commercial land mass” of the country, they suffer various financial exactions, statutory as well as contractual. It is not necessary for us, in these petitions, to enter into the intricacies of the procedures followed before the applicable duties or taxes are paid and the goods, are released by the Customs. We are concerned with the amount which the importers (or exporters, in the case of export goods) pay, during this period, to the shipping lines, Inland Container Depots (ICDs) and/or Container Freight Stations (CFSs). ICDs and CFSs are Customs Cargo Service Providers, who permit storage of imported goods, prior to their being released by the Customs after payment of duty, against pre-fixed and pre-determined charges. These charges involve various elements with which, too, we need not concern ourselves. The petitioners in these petitions are concerned with the penal charges levied by ICDs/CFSs, for the period, beyond a certain number of “free days”, during which the goods continue to remain in their premises, and levied by shipping lines, in the event the containers are not returned to them within a fixed number of “free days”. Ordinarily, therefore, after containers are unloaded from the vessel in which they arrive, the containers are required to be returned to the shipping lines within a contractually stipulated number of days. If they are so returned, no additional charge is levied on the importer. If they are not returned to the shipping lines within such “free days”, they suffer detention charges, levied by the shipping lines in accordance with the contract executed between the shipping lines and the importers. Similarly, ICDs and CFSs also permit the imported goods to be stored within their premises for a number of “free days”, on payment of normal charges. If the goods remain in their premises beyond such “free days”, they suffer penal charges, chiefly ground rent at much higher rates than is ordinarily charged.
2. The Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC; now rechristened “CBIC”) issued, on 22nd December, 1995, a Circular, simplifying the procedure for setting up ICDs and CFSs. We may reproduce paras 2 and 3 of the said Circular:
(a) approve proper places in any customs port or customs airport or coastal port for the unloading and loading of goods or for any class of goods;
(b) specify the limits of any customs area.”
This provision is required to be read in conjunction with Section 33 of the Customs Act:
“33. Unloading and loading of goods at approved places only. – Except with the permission of the proper officer, no imported goods shall be unloaded, and no export goods shall be loaded, at any place other than a place approved under clause (a) of section 8 for the unloading of loading of such goods.” by the Commissioners of Customs concerned. Normally, every CFS is located in a Customs Station or in an adjunct to a Customs station. CFS may handle exclusively export cargo or import cargo or both. Generally, CFS is taken to be an extended arm of the Port/ICD/ACC. Depending upon its importance and volume of work it handles, it functions like a full-fledged Customs Station wherein the admission, processing and completion of all customs procedures are done. Alternatively, the processing of the Customs clearance documents is done in the Customs House and the CFS functions like ‘Docks’ where the examination and sealing of export cargo or examination and customs clearance of import cargo is done. Thus, depending upon the location, workload and other related fact
Akhil Bhartiya Upbhokta Congress v. State of M.P., (2011) 5 SCC 29
BALCO Employees’ Union (Regd.) v U.O.I.
Bharti Airtel Ltd v. U.O.I., (2015) 12 SCC 1
City Industrial Development v. Platinum Entertainment
Deepak Agro Foods v. State of Rajasthan
DLF Universal Ltd. v. Director, Town and Country Planning Department, Haryana
Narmada Bachao Andolan v. U.O.I.
P.T.R. Exports (Madras) P Ltd v. U.O.I.
Peerless General Finance & Investment Co. Ltd v. R.B.I.
Prag Rice & Oil Mills v. U.O.I.
Rai Sahib Ram Jawaya Kapur v. State of Punjab
Richa Mishra v. State of Chhatisgarh (2016) 4 SCC 179
Secretary, A.P.D. Jain Pathshala v. Shivaji Bhagwat More
Shailesh Dhairyawan v. Mohan Balkrishna Lulla
State of M.P. v Nandlal Jaiswal
State of W.B. v. Sadan K. Bormal
Umesh Goel v. Himachal Pradesh Cooperative Group Housing Society
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.