V. KAMESWAR RAO
Pawan Kumar Gupta And Gurucharan Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Veena Dhingra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.
CM No. 15995/2021 (for delay)
This is an application filed by the appellants seeking condonation of delay in filing the present appeal.
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the delay in filing the present appeal is condoned.
Application is disposed of.
RFA 249/2021
1. This appeal has been filed by the appellants herein challenging the common order dated January 16, 2021 passed by the learned Additional District Judge; 02, (Central) Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (‘Trial Court’, for short) on applications filed by the respondents herein under Order XII Rule 6 and Order XXXIX Rule 10 read with Order XVA Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (‘CPC’, for short). Suffice to state, vide the said order, the Trial Court has allowed both the applications. In the application under Order XII Rule 6 CPC, it directed the recovery of possession of the suit property being shop no.35, Lower Ground Floor, Gaffar Market, Karol Bagh, New Delhi (‘suit property’, for short) and also in the application under Order XXXI Rule 10 read with Order XVA CPC it directed recovery of arrears of rent @ Rs.77,000/- per month along with interest at Rs.18% per annum from the da
Delhi Jal Board vs. Surendra P. Malik reported as 104 (2003) DLT 151
ITDC Ltd. Vs. M/s. Chander Pal Sood and Son reported in 84 (2000) DLT 337 DB
Manisha Commercial Ltd. v. Shri N.R. Dongre & Anr.
Himani Alloys Ltd. v. Tata Steel Ltd.
Ram Prakash Sharma v. Bulbul Birla (Dead) by LRS. & Ors.
Rajiv Srivastava vs. Sanjiv Tuli and Anr. reported as 119 (2005) DLT 202 (DB)
Uttam Singh Duggal and Co. Ltd. Vs. Union Bank of India reported as AIR 2000 SC 2740
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.