PRATHIBA M. SINGH
Mohit Bansal – Appellant
Versus
Institute of Chartered Accountants of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
1. The Petitioner- Mohit Bansal, is a qualified Chartered Accountant (hereinafter “CA”), enrolled with the Respondent No. 1 – Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (hereinafter, “ICAI”) since 25th January 2008.
2. The ICAI issued a notice dated 25th June 2018, to show cause as to why action under Section 8 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 (hereinafter, “Act”) should not be taken against the Petitioner in view of his conviction by the Delhi High Court under Sections 354 and 506-II of the Indian Penal Code 1860. The operative portion of the said notice reads as under:
However it has been noticed that vide the same judgment, the Hon’ble Delhi High Court has convicted you under another Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, i.e., ‘Assault or criminal force to woman
Pawan Kumar v. State of Haryana (1996) 4 SCC 17)
Union of India v. Ramesh Bishnoi
ICAI v. Vimal Kumar Surana and ors.
Subramani Gopalkrishnan v. ICAI
Mahipal Singh Rana v. State of UP (2016) 8 SCC 335
Ranchoddas Atmarain v. Union of India and Ors.
Ashwani Kumar Singh v. Union Public Services Commission and Ors.
Union of India v. Chajju Ram (Dead) by LRs
Rama Narang vs. Ramesh Narang (1995)2 SCC 513
Mahipal Singh Rana vs. State of U.P.
State Bank of India and Ors. vs. P. Soupramaniane
Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr. vs. Robin Singh (2010) 171 DLT 705 (DB)
Council of the ICAI vs. B. Mukherjea AIR 1958 SC 72
M.H. Devendrappa v/s Karnataka State Small Industries Corporation (1998) 3 SCC 732
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.