HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI, J.
Achleshwer Meena S/o Sh. Jatashanker Meena - Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. - Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3729 of 2024
Decided On : 17-03-2026
ORDER :
CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI, J.










1. Rakesh Kumar Meena Vs State of Rajasthan & Other connected matters S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition)No. 6395/2022; Order dated: 07.03.2025
2. Surinder Kumar & Ors. Vs State of Pb and others, CRM-M-5292-2024; Order dated 05.02.2024
3. Lalita Kumari Vs Govt. of U.P and ors, [2013] 14 SCR 713; Order dated; 12.11.2013
4. Vihaan Kumar Vs State of Haryana & Anr, 2025 INSC 162; Order dated; 07.02.2025
5. Sashikant Joshi Vs State of Rajasthan & ors; S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 565/2022; Order dated; 04.07.2023
6. Hukam Chand Shyam Lal Vs UOI & Ors; (1976) 2 SCC 128; Order dated; 17.12.1975
7. People's Union of Civil Liberties (PUCL) Vs Union of India (UOI) & Ors; MANU/SC/0149/1997; Order dated; 18.12.1996
8. Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (RETD.) and Anr. Vs Union of India & Ors; [2017] 10 S.C.R. 569; Order dated; 24.08.2017
9. Anuradha Bhasin Vs Union of India and other connected matters; WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 1031 OF 2019; Order dated; 10.01.2020
10. Central Bureau of Investigation Vs K.L.D. Nagasree & ors; Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.(s). 5584/2025; Order dated; 15.04.2025
11. Government of India Rep. by the Secretary Vs K.L.D. Nagasree & Ors. and other connected matters; 2023 SCC OnLine AP 1834; Order dated; 20.07.2023
12. Vinit Kumar Vs Central Bureau of Investigation & Ors; Writ Petition No. 2637 OF 2019; Order dated 22.10.2019 (Bombay High Court)
13. P. Kishore Vs The Secretary to the Govt. of India, Ministry of Home Affairs & Ors; W.P. No. 143 of 2018; Order dated; 02.07.2025
14. K.P. Tamilmaran Vs The Secretary by Deputy Superintendent Of Police; 2025 Live Law (SC) 493; Order dated; 28.04.2025
15. Ashak Hussain Allah Detha @ Siddique and another Vs The Assistant Collector of Customs (P) Bombay and another; 1990 SCC OnLine Bom 3; Order dated; 09.01.1990
16. Directorate of Enforcement Vs Subhash Sharma;2025 SCC OnLine SC 240; Order dated; 21.01.2025
17. Hanumant Jagganath Nazirkar Vs State of Maharashtra [Through PI of Baramati Taluka Police Station]; 2025 SCC OnLine Bom 2508; Order dated; 27.06.2025
18. Pradeep Nirankarnath Sharma Vs State of Gujarat & Ors; 2025 INSC 350; Order dated; 17.03.2025
19. Directorate of Enforcement Vs Deepak Mahajan & Anr;[1994] 1 S.C.R; Order dated; 31.01.1994




165. Search by police officer
Whenever an officer-in-charge of a police station or a police officer making an investigation has reasonable grounds for believing that anything necessary for the purpose of an investigation into any offence which he is authorised to investigate may be found in any place within the limits of the police station of which he is incharge, or to which he is attached, and that such thing cannot in his opinion be otherwise obtained without undue delay, such officer may, after recording in writing the grounds of his belief and specifying in such writing, so far as possible, the thing for which search is to be made, search, or cause search to be made, for such thing in any place within the limits of such station.
2) A police officer proceeding under sub-section (1), shall, if practicable, conduct the search in person.
3) If he is unable to conduct the search in person, and there is no other person competent to make the search present at the time, he may, after recording in writing his reasons for so doing, require any officer subordinate to him to make the search, and he shall deliver to such subordinate officer an order in writing, specifying the place to be searched, and so far as possible, the thing for which search is to be made; and such subordinate officer may thereupon search for such thing in such place.
4) The provisions of this Code as to search-warrants and the general provisions as to searches contained in section 100 shall, so far as may be, apply to a search made under this section.
5) Copies of any record made under sub-section (1) or sub-section (3) shall forthwith be sent to the nearest Magistrate empowered to take cognizance of the offence, and the owner or occup



























The judgment emphasizes the importance of strict adherence to legal provisions and procedural guarantees against abuse of interference with privacy under the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 and Rule 419-A....
The court affirmed that legal interception of telephonic conversations is permissible under Section 5(2) of the Indian Telegraph Act for serious offences, and justified the condonation of a 22-day de....
Test of admissibility of evidence lies in its relevancy, unless there is an express or necessarily implied prohibition in the Constitution or other law evidence obtained as a result of illegal search....
The interception of messages under Section 5(2) of the Indian Telegraph Act must demonstrate public safety or emergency; mere statutory recitation is insufficient.
Prosecution sanction under the Prevention of Corruption Act must be granted with independent application of mind; failure to comply invalidates proceedings.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.