YOGESH KHANNA
Shriraj Investment And Finance Limited – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India Thr. Secretary – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Yogesh Khanna, J. - Both these petitions are taken up together as similar issues are being raised.
2. W.P.(CRL.)1823/2020 is filed for impugning the letter dated 29.06.2019 and the corrigendum issued on 29.11.2019 by the respondent no.1 directing the respondent no.2 to file complaint against the petitioners for the offences under the Companies Act, 2013 mentioned therein and secondly issuing directions to respondent no.2 to initiate the proceedings under Section 241/242/246 read with Section 339 of the Companies Act, before the NCLT.
3. It is submitted the letter dated 29.06.2019 calls for freezing and disgorgement of assets of 157 companies to be sold despite the fact such companies are functional. Following grounds have been taken to challenge the impugned order a) per Section 212(14) of the Companies Act if the final report is filed before the Central Government, it needs to be examined by it and after taking legal advice it may initiate the prosecution. Section 212(14) of the Companies Act runs as under:
“212. Investigation into affairs of Company by Serious Fraud Investigation Office (1) to (13) xxxxx.
(14) On receipt of the investigation report, the Central Government may
Arcelormittal India (P) Ltd. vs. Satish Kumar Gupta
Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-I, New Delhi vs. Vatika Township Pvt. Ltd.
Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors. vs. Chhabil Dass Agarwal
Hitendra Vishnu Thakur & Ors. vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Kusum Ingots & Alloys Ltd. vs. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.