IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, J.
KLA Const Technologies Pvt. Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Embassy Of Islamic Republic Of Afghanistan - Respondent
OMP (ENF.) (Comm.) 82/2019 & EX.Appl.(OS) 901/2021
Decided On : 13-09-2021
Arbitration and Conciliation Act - Enforcement of Arbitral Award - Settlement Agreement
Fact of the Case:
Decree holder filed execution petition seeking enforcement of the arbitral award for a contract with the Embassy of Islamic Republic of Afghanistan. A settlement agreement was reached between the parties, and the decree holder sought the decree in terms of the settlement agreement.
Finding of the Court:
The court recalled the interim order and decreed the suit in terms of the settlement agreement, binding both parties to its terms.
Issues: Enforcement of arbitral award, settlement agreement terms, recall of interim order
Ratio Decidendi: The court found the settlement agreement to be binding and decreed the suit in terms of the agreement, recalling the interim order.
Final Decision: The court decreed the suit in terms of the settlement agreement and ordered the decree sheet to be drawn accordingly.
JUDGMENT
(Oral)
1. Present execution petition has been filed under Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act read with Order XXI Rule 11(2) of the CPC, 1908 on behalf of decree holder seeking enforcement of the arbitral award dated 26.11.2018.
2. Decree holder – Ashok Kumar, Authorised Representative of KLA Const. Technologies Private Limited company and judgment debtor – The Embassy of Islamic Republic of Afghanistan had entered into a contract for the rehabilitation of building of the judgment debtor/Afghan Embassy in Delhi for a total contract of Rs. 3,02,17,066.83 exclusive of taxes.
3. Pertinently, during execution of work, certain disputes arose between the parties, for resolution of which decree holder invoked the arbitration clause in view of the terms and conditions of the work contract, however, judgment debtor did not respond, therefore, decree holder approached the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India by filing a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 being ARB.P. (Civil) No. 14/2014.
4. Vide order dated 05.01.2015, THE Hon’ble Supreme Court appointed Shri H.S. Dogra, Director General (Retd.) CPWD sole arbitrator. Accordingly, decree holder filed its claim of Rs. 2,00,47,192.82 along with pendent lite and future interest before the Arbitrator. Again the judgment debtor did not join the arbitration proceedings and were accordingly proceeded ex parte vide order dated 13.11.2017. The learned Arbitrator partially allowed the claims of the decree holder by passing an award dated 26.11.2018.
5. During the course of hearing today, learned counsel for the decree holder submits that an out of court settlement has been arrived at between the decree holder and judgment debtor and the terms of settlement are recorded in the Settlement Agreement dated 11.09.2021 and the present suit can be decreed in terms thereof. The aforesaid submissions of learned counsel for the decree holder, is affirmed by the counsel appearing for judgment debtor.
6. Though the aforesaid Settlement Agreement dated 11.09.2021, which is stated to have been filed today vide diary number 755400/2021 in the Registry, is not on record, however, a hard copy thereof has been produced before this Court.
7. The terms of settlement have been enumerated in Para-1.1 to Para-2.5 of the Settlement Agreement. According to the settlement, judgment debtor toward full and final settlement of all claims and outstanding dues toward the decree holder under the contract and arbitral award, has issued three cheques total amounting to Rs. 68,00,000/- drawn on Kotak Mahindra Bank, D-10, Nos.1 & 2, Local Shopping Centre, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi, details whereof have been given in Clause 1.1(i) to (iii) of the Settlement Agreement. Judgment debtor has also agreed to issue an appreciation letter in favour of decree holder towards successful and satisfactory execution of the settlement 8. In the light of clause 1.2 and 1.3 of the Settlement Agreement dated 11.09.2021, the parties have agreed that the Second Party from their Bank Account Nos. 3111478010, 3111478027 and 3111478041 in Kotak Mahindra Bank, Branch D Block, New Delhi-110057 will issue cheques from the aforementioned account and will jointly approach this court to recall its order dated 23.08.2021.
9. In the afore-mentioned agreement, Second Party also agrees to issue an appreciation letter in favour of first party attesting to the successful and satisfactory execution of the settlement.
10. Today, learned counsel for the judgment debtor submits that the judgment debtor shall remain bound by the terms of aforesaid Settlement Agreement dated 11.09.2021 and the post dated cheques shall be honoured.
11. In view of the aforesaid undertaking furnished on behalf of judgment debtor, learned counsel for decree holder submits that the present petition be decreed in terms of Settlement Agreement dated 11.09.2021 and the interim order dated 23.08.2021 with respect to maintaining of minimum balance of Rupees O
The settlement agreement reached between the parties was found to be binding, and the court decreed the suit in terms of the agreement.
The court reinforced that settled disputes through a Settlement Agreement should be honored and enforced to prevent ongoing litigation.
The court recognizes and upholds the mutual settlement reached between parties regarding the execution of an arbitral award, directing compliance within a specified timeframe.
Once the decretal amount of an arbitral award is satisfied, there is no further matter for adjudication in enforcement petitions.
Arbitral awards must be honored in full, including accrued interest, and obligations remain until full payment is made, even if part payments have occurred.
Awarded amount has to be paid together with future interest at rate of 12 percent per annum from date of award till date of payment on the awarded amount in favour of decree holder.
Execution of an arbitral award requires compliance with the 90-day limitation under Section 34; execution petitions filed before this period are impermissible.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.