SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, J.
Ipex Infrastructure (P.) Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Hindustan Construction Company - Respondent
OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 77 of 2021
Decided On : 25-11-2021




Arbitral awards must be honored in full, including accrued interest, and obligations remain until full payment is made, even if part payments have occurred.

Headnote:(A) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 36(1) - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Section 9 - Arbitral award rendered on 08.01.2019 for amount of Rs.8,35,33,837/- with 12% interest p.a. - Decree holder sought enforcement of award under Section 36 - Judgment debtor made payment of award amount but failed to include accrued interest through to the date of payment - The court determined that the judgment debtor is liable for interest up to the actual payment date, reaffirming that the award must be honored in its entirety - Direction issued for payment of due interest from 27.05.2019 until realization. (Paras 5, 16, 17)

(B) Contempt of Court - Failure of judgment debtor to comply with undertaking given to the Supreme Court to pay the adjudicated amount and subsequent liability for interest as per the arbitral award. (Paras 3, 16)

Table of Content
1. overview of petition and arbitration award (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. claim of unpaid interest and compliance issues (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. court's evaluation of award compliance and obligations (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 15 , 16)
4. mandatory payment of outstanding interest (Para 14 , 17)
5. conclusion and disposal of the petition (Para 18)

JUDGMENT

1. Decree holder has filed the present petition under the provisions of Section 36 (1) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with Order XXI Rule 11 CPC with regard to arbitral award dated 08.01.2019 passed by the learned Arbitrator.

2. The grounds raised in the present petition by the decree holder are that in case Ref No. DAC/1600/03-17, titled as M/s. IPEX Infrastructure (P.) Ltd. Versus Hindustan Construction Company Ltd., an arbitration Award dated 08.01.2019 was passed by the learned arbitrator, whereunder decree holder was awarded amount of Rs.8,35,33,837/- with future interest at the rate of 12% p.a. from the date of award till the date of payment of the awarded amount. The Award in question was challenged by the judgment debtor under Section 34 of the Act, which was dismissed by this Court vide order dated 20.05.2019 [in OMP (COMM) 208/2019]. Thereafter, decree holder issued a statutory notice dated 27.05.2019 to the judgment debtor under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 demanding the payment in terms of awarded amount. Since judgment debtor failed to make the payment, therefore, decree holder filed a petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai, against the judgment debtor, wherein it claimed an amount of Rs.8,81,51,219/- from judgment debtor towards awarded amount along with interest @12% p.a. and Rs.8,00,000/- as cost of arbitration proceedings. In the meanwhile, appeal preferred by the judgment debtor under Section 37 of the Act (against dismissal of petition under Section 34 of the Act) was also dismissed vide order dated 30.08.2019 [in FAO (OS) (COMM) 207 of 2019].

3. During pendency of petition filed by the decree holder before the NCLT, judgment debtor preferred a writ petition [WP (C) No. 1074/2019] before the Hon'ble Supreme Court challenging Section 87 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as well as provisions of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, wherein judgment debtor undertook to pay the amount of Rs.8.81 Crores within a period of 12 weeks to the decree holder and also sought a stay before NCLT at the stage of pronouncement of judgment. However, since judgment debtor failed to pay the agreed amount within the stipulated period, as undertaken before the Hon'ble Supreme Court, decree holder filed a contempt petition [Contempt Pet. (C) No. 85/2020] against the judgment debtor. The said petition was disposed of by the Hon'ble Supreme Court vide order dated 07.02.2020 holding that prima facie contempt was made by the judgment debtor and last opportunity was granted to make payment within two weeks in compliance of order dated 13.09.2019.

4. Pursuant to order dated 07.02.2020 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the contempt petition, judgment debtor made payment of Rs.8,81,51,219/- on 19.02.2020 to the decree holder.

5. Pertinently, the grievance raised in the present petition by the decree holder is that the payment towards the arbitral Award was made by the judgment debtor on 19.02.2020 and thereby, judgment debtor was under the obligation to pay interest @12% p.a. on the awarded amount till then, in terms of the Award. However, payment of Rs.8,81,51,219/- made by judgment debtor did not include interest till 19.02.2020.

6. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for decree holder drew attention of this Court to Para-20 of the petition, wherein the calculation of amount payable till 19.02.2020 has been spelt out. The relevant portion thereof reads as under:

a) Arbitral award amountRs.8,35,33,837/-
b) Interest on the awarded

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top