SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
KLA Const Technologies Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Embassy of Islamic Republic of Afghanistan – Respondent


Table of Content
1. details of the arbitration agreement and disputes. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. discussion of the settlement agreement. (Para 5 , 10 , 11)
3. court observations regarding the settlement terms. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 12)
4. disposal of the petition based on the agreement. (Para 13 , 14)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. Present execution petition has been filed under Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act read with Order XXI Rule 11(2) of the CPC, 1908 on behalf of decree holder seeking enforcement of the arbitral award dated 26.11.2018.

2. Decree holder - Ashok Kumar, Authorised Representative of KLA Const. Technologies Private Limited company and judgment debtor - The Embassy of Islamic Republic of Afghanistan had entered into a contract for the rehabilitation of building of the judgment debtor/Afghan Embassy in Delhi for a total contract of Rs.3,02,17,066.83 exclusive of taxes.

3. Pertinently, during execution of work, certain disputes arose between the parties, for resolution of which decree holder invoked the arbitration clause in view of the terms and conditions of the work contract, however, judgment debtor did not respond, therefore, decree holder approached the Hon

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top