IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Rekha Palli, J.
Reena Chadha & Anr. - Appellants
Versus
Govt. Of NCT Of Delhi - Respondent
W.P.(C) 6653 of 2021
Decided On : 09-09-2021
Marriage Registration - Compulsory Registration of Marriage - Delhi (Compulsory Registration of Marriage) Order, 2014 - The Registration Order - Seema (Smt) Vs. Ashwani Kumar (2006) 2 SCC 578
Fact of the Case:
An Indian couple residing in the USA seeks registration of their marriage in Delhi as per the Delhi (Compulsory Registration of Marriage) Order, 2014. They are unable to physically appear due to travel restrictions and argue for the acceptance of their appearance through Video Conferencing.
Finding of the Court:
The court finds that personal appearance for marriage registration can include appearance through Video Conferencing, as established by previous decisions and technological advancements. The insistence on physical presence would hinder the purpose of the Registration Order and is not necessary for the task of registering a marriage that has already been solemnized.
Issues: The main issue is whether personal appearance for marriage registration can include appearance through Video Conferencing, considering the circumstances of the petitioners residing in the USA and facing travel restrictions.
Ratio Decidendi: The court establishes that the term 'personal appearance' in Clause 4 of the Registration Order should be interpreted to include presence secured through Video Conferencing. This interpretation aligns with previous decisions, technological advancements, and the objective of the Registration Order to promote registration of marriages.
Final Decision: The court allows the petition and directs the parties to submit their application for marriage registration through their counsel/Power of Attorney Holder in physical form and to appear through Video Conferencing. The respondent is ordered to expedite the registration and issue the Marriage Registration Certificate within two weeks.
JUDGMENT
Rekha Palll, J. (Oral). - The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by an Indian couple residing in the United States of America (USA), seeks a direction to the concerned Sub-Divisional Magistrate (SDM), New Delhi to register their marriage in accordance with the provisions of the Delhi (Compulsory Registration of Marriage) Order, 2014 {hereinafter referred to as the 'Registration Order') without insisting on their physical appearance before him.
2. That the marriage between the petitioners was solemnized at Delhi on 06.12.2001 as per Hindu rites and ceremonies. They are now blessed with a son and a daughter born on 23.10.2002 and on 22.11.2011, respectively.
3. It may be noticed at the outset that the aforesaid Registration Order of 2014 was promulgated post the directions issued by the Supreme Court in Seema (Smt) Vs. Ashwani Kumar (2006) 2 SCC 578. Pursuant thereto, the registration of marriages solemnized in Delhi was made compulsory under this Registration Order.
4. That the procedure for registration has been provided for in clause 4 of the Registration Order and the same reads as under:
"4. Procedure
(a) Within a period of 60 days, excluding the day on which the final ceremony of marriage is solemnized, the parties to the marriage shall apply jointly in the prescribed Form-A for registration of their marriage addressed to the marriage officer having jurisdiction to register the same.
(b) Such prescribed application shall be accompanied by documentary proof of age of both of the parties to the marriage, solemnization of marriage, identification of the parties, place of residence of the parties to the marriage, citizenship of the parties if any along with the requisite fee of rupees Two Hundred.
(c) On receiving such application alongwith requisite documents as prescribed above and satisfaction of the marriage officer as regard authenticity of such proof the same shall be entered in the register of marriage prescribed for this purpose as per Form-B.
(d) After having received such application complete in all aspect and having entered the same in the prescribed register, the marriage officer shall fix a date for the parties to appear in person alongwith two witnesses who shall certify to the solemnization of such marriage and bearing proof of permanent resident of Delhi.
(e) The marriage officer thereafter on personal appearance of the parties with witnesses on such appointed date or any other extended date and on satisfaction of solemnization of such marriage in Delhi shall issue the requisite certificate of registration of such marriage as per Form-C."
5. The Registration Order also envisaged creation of an on-line portal so as to enable the parties to submit online applications for registration, the provision whereof has been prescribed in clause 9 which reads as under:-
"9. E-registration:
The Govt. of NCT of Delhi shall endeavor to create a dedicated portal for the purpose of online submission of application and prior appointment to facilitate compulsory registration of marriage. The application form alternatively shall be available on such portal which may be downloaded by the parties and be submitted alongwith requisite documents manually at the respective counters of the marriage registration offices. On such submission either manually or online, a computer generated priority number alongwith appointed dated for registration of marriage shall be made available to the applicants to be produced at the time of personal appearance before the marriage officer to register the marriage. "
6. It is petitioner's case that since they, alongwith their minor son, had already relocated to Singapore before 2014, they could not apply for registration of their marriage when the order came into effect. They, having since relocated to USA, where they are residing on the strength of a LI visa issued in favour of petitioner no.2 husband and a L2 visa (dependent visa) in favour of petitioner no.l wife
Anuradha Bhasin v.Union of India
National Textile Workers' Union vs. P.R. Ramakrishnan (1983) 1 SCC 228
Seema (Smt) vs. Ashwani Kumar (2006) 2 SCC 578
AI
The term 'personal appearance' in the context of marriage registration can include appearance through Video Conferencing, as established by previous decisions and technological advancements.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's recognition of the evolving technology and its application in the registration of marriages under the Special Marriage Act, allowing fo....
The court established that marriage under the Special Marriage Act can be solemnized through video conferencing, recognizing the need for legal frameworks to adapt to technological advancements.
Section 6 of Information Technology Act recognise use of electronic records in Government and its agencies.
In extraordinary situations, innovative ways, including the use of technology, can be adopted to fulfill statutory requirements.
The court affirmed the validity of virtual attendance during the marriage registration process, concluding that registration rendered the petition moot.
The court ruled that technical objections should not obstruct mutual consent divorce proceedings, allowing representation via power of attorney and video conferencing, emphasizing the need for judici....
The court established that technical objections should not hinder the process of mutual consent divorce, allowing virtual appearances and representation through power of attorneys.
Court allowed online marriage registration as per Special Marriage Act procedures despite one party's physical absence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.