SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 1191

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
V. Kameswar Rao, J.
Sachin Kumar Gupta & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
Dedicated Freight Corridors Corporation Of India Limited - Respondent
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 415 of 2021; Civil Miscellaneous No. 19312 of 2021
Decided On : 06-08-2021

Advocates appeared:
Saurabh Agrawal, Advocate, Komal Mundhra, Advocate, Shantanu Singh, Advocate, V.S.R. Krishna, Advocate, V. Shashank Kumar, Advocate

The court emphasized the application of the new recruitment and promotion policy, effective from January 01, 2021, to the creation of the 22 posts, rejecting the petitioners' claim for promotion under the old rules.

Headnote:

Promotion - Recruitment and Promotion Policy - Circular No. 648/2020 dated October 22, 2020 - Circular No. 640/2020 dated October 16, 2020 - State of Rajasthan v R. Dayal, (1997) 10 SCC 419 - Y.V. Rangaiah And Ors. vs J. Sreenivasa Rao And Ors, (1983) AIR SC 852

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners sought promotion to E2 level, claiming that they were eligible for promotion as per the old rules, prior to the amendment of the promotion policy. The respondent argued that the new policy, effective from January 01, 2021, applied to the creation of 22 posts on October 22, 2020.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the new recruitment and promotion policy, effective from January 01, 2021, applied to the creation of the 22 posts, rejecting the petitioners' claim for promotion under the old rules.

Issues: The main issue was whether the posts created on October 22, 2020 needed to be filled under the old policy or the new policy effective from January 01, 2021.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the new recruitment and promotion policy, effective from January 01, 2021, and rejected the petitioners' claim for promotion under the old rules.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the petition, stating that the new policy applied to the creation of the 22 posts, and the petitioners' claim for promotion under the old rules was rejected.

JUDGMENT

V. Kameswar Rao, J. - The present petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayers:-

In view of the aforementioned facts and circumstances, this Hon ble Court may be pleased to:

a. Issue a writ, order and/or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent to fill up the 22 posts created on 22.10.2020 in the S&T Department, as per the extant rules at the time of creation of such posts; AND

b. Issue a writ, order and/or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent to call the Petitioners for interview against the 22 posts, in accordance with the old Promotion Policy, as applicable on 22.10.2020; AND

c. Issue, a writ, order and/or direction in the nature of mandamus to quash the Office Order No. HQ/HR/Misc/S&T/Vol.-I dated 30.12.2020; AND/OR

d. Issue a writ, order and/or direction in the nature of mandamus to quash the Vacancy Notice No. 02/2021 dated 04.01.2021; AND/OR

e. Issue a writ, order and/or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent to place on record all the relevant documents by way of which additional posts were created by surrendering of existing posts and Circular No. 640/2020 dated 22.10.2020 was issued; AND/OR

f. Pass any other order(s) and/or direction(s), that this Hon ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the present case."

2. It is the case of the petitioners that they were appointed with the respondent s organization at E0 level on March 27, 2012 in the pay scale of Rs.12600 32500. They were promoted to E1 level (Senior Executive) on June 02, 2017. On May 16, 2019, vide Circular No. 07/2019, the promotion policy for E0 and above grade employees was amended whereby it was stated that no written test for promotion from Grade E1 to E2 would be taken and the same would be on the basis of interview of eligible employees.

3. It is their case and so contended by Mr. Saurabh Agrawal that the petitioners being in Engineering department which consist of Electrical and S&T department in which the petitioners are working, all eligible employees of electrical department were promoted to the E2 grade, i.e., Junior Manager on May 14, 2020 whereas the petitioners were denied the same benefit despite the petitioners being eligible.

4. On October 13, 2020, the Board of Directors created 22 posts (14 in E2 grade and 08 in E3 grade) with matching surrender from E0 grade to ease out the promotional prospects of employees in S&T Department, as a one-time measure and accordingly a circular No.648/2020 dated October 22, 2020 was issued. He contended that the respondents had also issued Circular no. 640/2020 dated October 16, 2020, revising recruitment and promotion policy whereby as per Clause 8.7.1(b)(i) of the said circular, a new criteria of competitive examination (Computer Based Test) has been added for promotion to E2 grade and has been made applicable to all those employees in the lower cluster, who have 03 years service experience, whereas the petitioners herein had to wait for 8 years for the opportunity of promotion.

5. Mr. Agrawal submits that the petitioners being eligible for promotion to the post of E2 level with effect from January 01, 2020, as per promotional rules as existing earlier, the vacancies which occurred prior to amendment of service / promotional rules would be governed by the old rules and not by the amended rules as per circular dated October 16, 2020. In other words, Circular dated October 16, 2020 will not be applicable to the filling up of 22 post notified on October 22, 2020, as the said policy will come into effect from January 01, 2021 in accordance with Clause 9 of the said circular. He lays stress on the fact that the 22 posts created in the S&T department by way of circular dated October 22, 2020 were intended to rectify the great disparity in promotional opportunities. However, the respondent Organization rather than promoting the employees of E1 level, have sought to fill up the post of E2 level by way of depu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top