Back
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, AMIT BANSAL
National Board Of Examinations – Appellant
Versus
Rajani Sinha – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J. - This intra-court appeal impugns the judgment dated 1st October, 2019, allowing W.P.(C) No.12477/2018 preferred by the respondent no.1 and directing the appellant National Board of Examinations (NBE) to issue a Diplomate of National Board (DNB) Degree in the Family Medicine specialty, qua the concerned year, in favour of the respondent no.1.
2. The appeal came up first before the Court on 15th November, 2019, when the same was admitted and after hearing the counsel for the respondent no.1 appearing on advance notice on that date, the operation, implementation and execution of the impugned judgment was stayed during the pendency of the appeal.
3. We have heard the counsels.
4. The facts, not in dispute, are (i) the respondent no.1, a graduate in Medicine and desirous of a DNB qualification awarded by the appellant NBE, participated in the Centralized Entrance Test (CET) of the year 2015 and on being declared successful therein, was registered for training with the respondent no.4 Christian Institute of Health, Sciences & Research, Dimapur, Nagaland (Institute), accredited to the appellant NBE and commenced her three years training programme, on 24th June
The interpretation of the National Board of Examinations regarding the determination of eligibility and conduct of examinations is final and binding. Any relief granted must be in accordance with the....
Eligibility for examinations must adhere strictly to prescribed rules, and deviation based on sympathy undermines academic standards.
The court emphasized the importance of adhering to the approved extension period and highlighted the unjustifiability of withholding the result based solely on the cut-off date for completion of trai....
The court emphasized the importance of considering the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case and directed NBE to grant appropriate extension in accordance with the Leave Rules for DNB/FNB Trai....
The denial of study leave to the petitioners was found to be unfair, and the court emphasized the importance of following the prescribed time schedule for admission to medical courses.
Maternity leave cannot be counted against leave limits for trainees, and courts can intervene in exceptional health circumstances to allow leave extensions beyond standard rules.
Grant of study leave for doctors is not an absolute right and may be denied based on public service exigencies, especially during emergencies like a pandemic.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the recognition and equivalence of medical qualifications under the IMC Act 1956 and the NMC Act 2019, particularly in relation to the eligibili....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
