IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Manmohan, Asha Menon, JJ.
Sub (pa) Awadhesh Kr Singh - Appellant
Versus
Union Ofindia & Ors. - Respondents
W.P. (C) No. 3620 of 2021; C.M. Appl No. 10987 of 2021, 10988 of 2021
Decided On : 22-03-2021
Exemption - Posting Dispute - [W.P. (C) No. 3620/2021 & C.M. Appl. No. 10988/2021 (Stay)] - [Posting Order dated 24th September, 2020] - The court discussed the posting order, the conditions mentioned in it, and the undertaking by the Petitioner. It also highlighted the requirement for Govt. sanction letter for change of rank in PA category and the decision of the integrated HQ of MOD (Army) not to approve the upgradation of PA post in its Embassy in India in Nepal to that of Subedar. The court concluded that the decision not to transfer the Petitioner to the Embassy of India in Nepal was neither arbitrary nor vitiated by malice, and the Petitioner had no vested right over a particular post in a particular embassy. The court also emphasized that transfer is a matter of exigency of service.
Fact of the Case:
The Petitioner challenged the direction to return to Unit HQ 161 INF BDE i.e., Uri Division of Kashmir, seeking to continue attachment to Army HQ till departure on posting to Defence Attache, Embassy of India at Kathmandu. The Respondents directed the Petitioner to be reverted back to MP-I for further disposal and appoint a suitable person in the rank of Havaldar, PA at Kathmandu in Nepal.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the condition in the posting order did not operate as an estoppel against the Respondents, and the decision not to transfer the Petitioner to the Embassy of India in Nepal was neither arbitrary nor vitiated by malice. The Petitioner had no vested right over a particular post and transfer is a matter of exigency of service.
Issues: Challenge to the direction to return to Unit HQ 161 INF BDE, seeking to continue attachment to Army HQ till departure on posting to Defence Attache, Embassy of India at Kathmandu.
Ratio Decidendi: The condition in the posting order did not operate as an estoppel against the Respondents. The decision not to transfer the Petitioner to the Embassy of India in Nepal was neither arbitrary nor vitiated by malice. The Petitioner had no vested right over a particular post and transfer is a matter of exigency of service.
Final Decision: The present writ petition along with pending applications is dismissed.
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J. -
C.M. Appl. No. 10987/2021 (Exemption)
Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of.
W.P. (C) No. 3620/2021 & C.M. Appl. No. 10988/2021 (Stay)
1. Present writ petition has been filed challenging Respondent s letter dated 03rd February, 2021 and Movement Order dated 09 February 2021 directing the Petitioner to return to Unit i.e., HQ 161 INF BDE i.e., Uri Division of Kashmir. Petitioner seeks a direction to the Respondents to withhold his movement since he is being directed to report back to Unit with thirty days leave upto 12th March, 2021 contrary to his posting Order dated 24 September 2020. Petitioner further seeks direction to the Respondents to allow him to continue his attachment to Army HQ (Addl Dir GenIntemational Co-operation, Foreign Divisions) till pendency of this Writ or /and till his departure on posting to Defence Attache, Embassy of India at Kathmandu for which approval was given by Respondent No.2 vide letter dated 03 September 2020. Petitioner also seeks direction to the Respondents to withhold the posting/ movement of any Defence Attache to Embassy Kathmandu (Nepal) in place of Petitioner and call all the records with regard to non approval of Petitioner s name for posting as JCOs(PA) to Defence Wing abroad by the Secretary, DMA as the same is contrary to the letter dated 3rd September 2020. Petitioner lastly prays that the Respondents be directed not to harass the Petitioner un-necessarily by forcing him to sign any un-willingness etc. or any other kind of documents/ proceedings which make him ineligible for foreign posting.
2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that in the posting order dated 24th September, 2020 it has been stated that Representation for cancellation/diversion/deferment of posting will not be entertained. Move will be carried out as intimated by ADG(MP-1) and a copy of move order will be endorsed to this office for updating records. Consequently, according to him, Respondents cannot now cancel or act contrary to the order dated 24th September, 2020.
3. He states that the petitioner has invested all his savings in buying necessary items etc. as this foreign posting was not only a matter of pride for him but also for his family. He also states that on 14th January, 2020, MP-I of the Respondents had issued a letter to ASC Records (S) of the Petitioner issuing a call up notice for attachment with integrated Headquarter of Ministry of Defence (Army) for briefing and language study prior to posting to its mission abroad.
4. Per contra, learned counsel for the Respondents has handed over in Court the Minutes of proceedings of Board of Officers dated 26th December, 2018 of the candidates who had not only attended but also passed the course for Selection and Posting of Combatant Staff for Foreign Assignments course at Sr.No.40. The relevant portion of the Minutes of Board of Officers reads as under:-
"3. There are few indls cases which were discussed by the BOO and u/m was decided:-
(a)JCO Clk (SD) Cat. JC-668221H Sub Maj Kuldeep Rajoriya was promoted as Sub Maj on 01 September 2018 and therefore has got four yr residual service till dt 31 August 2022. The JCO Clk is therefore not eligible for the vacs in Embassies of India where in the tenure of three yrs is beyond August 2022. It is decided by the BOO to detail the JCO i.e Sub Maj Clk Kuldeep Rajoriya for HCI, Islamabad (Pakistan) where the tenure of 18 months is likely to finish by February 21/22 subject to all other clearances in time.
(b)JCO PA Cat. JC-670876N Nb Sub PA Awadhesh Kumar Singh is being detailed for vac of EoI, Nepal as per his position in merit. However, the issue of present GSL being for Hav PAs only was brought out by the member of MIFD. The BOO has therefore decided to detail the JCO for Nepal vac as reserve pending the modification of the GSL and necessary Govt sanction for change of rank in PA category. The JCO has been informed accordingly. The Hav PA who is res one
The decision not to transfer the Petitioner to the Embassy of India in Nepal was neither arbitrary nor vitiated by malice, and the Petitioner had no vested right over a particular post in a particula....
A posting order does not create an estoppel against the authority, emphasizing the non-existence of vested rights over particular posts in personnel transfers governed by service exigency.
Deployment decisions are administrative and within the discretion of the competent authorities, but must be made in accordance with relevant policies and without discrimination.
Transfer and posting decisions in a disciplined force are made by the competent authority in the interest of the Force, and individual requests for specific locations may not be entertained.
A CRPF personnel's eligibility for transfer and relaxation of transfer conditions on medical grounds are determined by the Standing Order, and completion of prescribed tenures justifies transfer orde....
The central legal point established is that the transfer of the petitioner was in accordance with the Standing Order 07/2014, which governs postings upon promotion.
Administrative authorities must adhere to established standing orders regarding personnel transfers, and courts must respect compliance with procedure unless clear irregularity is shown.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.