SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 2200

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Manmohan, Asha Menon, JJ.
Pradeep Kumar - Appellant
Versus
Union Of India And Ors - Respondent
W.P.(C) No. 6834 of 2019
Decided On : 16-03-2021

Advocates appeared:
Saahila Lamba, Advocate, Rajan Sabharwal, Advocate, Raghav Sabharwal, Advocate

The redeployment decision should consider the medical condition of the petitioner and be commensurate with it.

Headnote:

Redeployment - Medical Condition - The court directed the respondents to take a fresh decision on the redeployment of the petitioner, considering his medical condition, and communicate the decision by a specified date.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner challenged the order redeploying him as Tech-lII/Welder/Civil/Engg in Railway Protection Force, citing medical condition and seeking redeployment in a suitable department.

Finding of the Court:

The court found the current deployment of the petitioner not reasonable in view of his medical condition and directed the respondents to take a fresh decision on redeployment.

Issues: Redeployment of petitioner in Railway Protection Force, commensurate with medical condition.

Ratio Decidendi: The decision to redeploy the petitioner should consider his medical condition, and if necessary, be at a lower grade in any cadre commensurate with his condition.

Final Decision: The court directed the respondents to take a fresh decision on the redeployment of the petitioner, considering his medical condition, and communicate the decision by a specified date.

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. - C.M.No.859/2021

    1. Present application has been filed by the respondents/applicant seeking vacation of interim order dated 21stJune, 2019 passed by this Court whereby the operation of the impugned order dated 03rd May, 2019 had been stayed.

    2. With consent of the parties, the main writ petition itself is taken up for hearing.

    3. Accordingly, the present application stands disposed of.

      W.P. (C) 6834/2019

      4. It is pertinent to mention that the present writ petition had been filed challenging the order dated 03rd May, 2019 whereby the petitioner has been redeployed as Tech-lII/Welder/Civil/Engg in Railway Protection Force. It is further prayed that a direction be issued to the respondents to re-deploy the petitioner in Ministerial Cadre of Railway Protection Force or in any other suitable department commensurate with medical condition of petitioner.

      5. Ms. Saahila Lamba, learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn this Court's attention to the order dated 17th December, 2019 passed in a batch of writ petitions with lead case being W.P.(C) No.13310/2019. She also candidly states that the petitioner has no objection to being redeployed at a lower grade in any cadre provided the job is commensurate with the medical condition of the petitioner. According to her, the redeployment post, at present, is non-commensurate with medical condition of the petitioner inasmuch as the job involves extensive physical labour.

      6. However, Mr.Rajan Sabharwal, learned standing counsel for the respondent-Railways states that the Suitability Committee of the respondents has found the petitioner fit to be deployed as TechlII/Welder/Civil/Engg.

      7. Since the petitioner was suffering from Hypertension (HTN) which led to him having seizures and epileptic episodes, this Court keeping in view the order dated 17th December, 2019 passed in a similar batch of writ petitions is of the opinion that current deployment of the petitioner is not reasonable.

      8. Consequently, this Court directs the respondents to take a fresh decision on whether the present petitioner can be re-deployed even at a lower grade in any cadre provided the job is commensurate to his medical condition.

      9. The decision will be rendered not later than 15th April, 2021 and communicated to the petitioner by 23rd April, 2021. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the fresh decision/order, it will be open to the petitioner to seek remedies in accordance with law.

      10. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs.

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top