IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
C. Hari Shankar, J.
In Re : Ara Hospitality Private Limited - Appellant
Versus
. - Respondent
Company Petition No. 21 of 2020
Decided On : 08-02-2021
Companies Act - Dissolution of Company - Section 497(6) - 485, 484(1), 493, 497 of the Companies Act, 1956
Fact of the Case:
The petition is filed under section 497(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking dissolution of the Company ARA Hospitality Private Limited in members voluntary liquidation. The company was incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 with an authorized capital of Rs. 15,00,00,000 and a paid-up capital of Rs. 11,53,78,000. The company went through multiple voluntary liquidator appointments and liquidation proceedings before the Official Liquidator sought dissolution.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the necessary compliance of Section 497 and other relevant provisions of the Act had been made, and the affairs of the company had not been conducted in a manner prejudicial to the interest of its members or to the public interest. The court concluded that the company may be dissolved, and accordingly, the company was wound up and deemed to be dissolved.
Issues: The main issue was whether the company met the requirements for dissolution under Section 497(6) of the Companies Act, 1956.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the satisfaction of the Official Liquidator that the necessary compliance of Section 497 and other relevant provisions of the Act had been made, and the affairs of the company had not been conducted in a manner prejudicial to the interest of its members or to the public interest.
Final Decision: The company was wound up and deemed to be dissolved with effect from the date of the filing of the petition.
JUDGMENT
C. Hari Shankar, J. - This petition is filed under section 497(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") by the Official Liquidator (OL), seeking dissolution of the Company ARA Hospitality Private Limited (in members voluntary liquidation).
2. The said Company was incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 with the name "ARA Hospitality Pvt. Ltd." with Registrar of Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana on 25th June, 2004 (Twenty Fifth Day of June Two Thousand Four) with an authorized capital of Rs. 15,00,00,000 (Rupees fifteen Crores only). The Paid-up Capital of the Company as per the Master Data available on the portal of MCA21 is Rs. 11,53,78,000/- (Rupees Eleven Crores Fifty Three Lacs & Seventy Eight Thousand only).
3. The registered office of the company is situated within the territory of NCT of Delhi at Central Wing, Ground Floor, Thapar House, 124, Janpath, New Delhi-110001.
4. The first promoters at the time of incorporation were Mr. Rahul Bhatia, Mr. Arun Khanna & Mr. Anil Chanana.
5. At the time of Members Voluntary Winding up of the petitioner company, there were five equity shareholders. The directors at the time of Members Voluntary Winding-up were Mr. Arun Khanna, Mr. Anil Parashar& Mr. Anil Chanana. The financial position of the company as disclosed in the audited balance sheets ending as on 31st March, 2013 and 31st March, 2012 are also annexed to the petition.
6. The prescribed Form No. 149 for the Declaration of Solvency was filed with the Registrar of Companies on 7th June, 2013 vide SRN No. B76621044.
7. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 484 (1) of the Act and other applicable provisions of the Act, the Extra Ordinary General Meeting of the Members of the said company was held on 10th June, 2013 and a special resolution was passed whereby Mr. Manoj Jagdish Malhotra was appointed as the Voluntary Liquidator on 10th June, 2013. After his resignation on 3rd September, 2014, Sh. Mukund Anand Thakkar was appointed as the Liquidator on 3rd September, 2014 and he resigned on 28th November, 2016. Thereafter, a Special Resolution was passed by the company on 21st December, 2016 and Mr. Arun Kapur was appointed as the Voluntary Liquidator of the company. After all the liquidation proceedings were conducted by Mr. Arun Kapur, however he also resigned on 11th September, 2019 and Mr. Shailendra Gupta was appointed as the Voluntary Liquidator vide resolution dated 4th October, 2019 In this regard Form MGT-14 was filed with the Registrar of Companies.
8. That as per the requirement of Section 485 of the Act, the Company has published a notification in newspapers namely "The Financial Express" in English and "Jansatta" in Hindi on 11th June, 2013 and in "The Gazette of India" on 14th September, 2013.
9. The notice of appointment of Voluntary Liquidator in Form 152 as required under Section 493 R/W Rule 315 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 was filed with the Registrar of Companies. The Voluntary Liquidators Mr. Arun Kapoor and Mr. Shailender Gupta had also published Form 151 of their respective appointments as Voluntary Liquidator.
10. Further, pursuant to the provisions of Section 497 of the Act, the Liquidator has also published Form No.155 in the newspapers namely "Financial Express" in English & "Jansatta" in Hindi on 18th February, 2017 and in The Gazette of India on 11th March, 2017 for the final meeting to be held on 23rd March, 2017.
11. The Final Meeting of the said company was held on 23rd March, 2017and the Voluntary Liquidator filed accounts of the said Company in Form No. 156 & 157 as prescribed under Rule 329 & 331 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 for the period from 1st November, 2016 to 15th February, 2017 before the Registrar of Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana, New Delhi on 29th March, 2017 and with the Official Liquidator on 30th March, 2017.
12. The Official Liquidator has received No Dues Certificate from Income Tax Department and no objection has bee
The central legal point established in the judgment is the satisfaction of the Official Liquidator regarding the compliance with relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and the absence of prej....
The court upheld the mandatory dissolution procedure under the Companies Act, confirming the compliance of the liquidation process and absence of unresolved liabilities, warranting the company's diss....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the court may order the dissolution of a company in members voluntary liquidation if it is satisfied that all necessary compliance of relev....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the satisfaction of compliance with relevant provisions of the Companies Act as a basis for the dissolution of a company under members voluntary li....
Satisfaction of necessary compliances and non-prejudicial conduct of the company's affairs are crucial for allowing voluntary winding up under the Companies Act, 1956.
The court's decision was based on the satisfaction of compliance with the relevant provisions of The Companies Act, 1956 and the absence of prejudicial conduct towards the interest of the members or ....
The court affirmed compliance with statutory procedures under the Companies Act for dissolution of a company in voluntary liquidation, finding no unresolved claims or liabilities.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the satisfaction of compliance with relevant provisions of the Companies Act and the absence of prejudicial conduct in the affairs of the compan....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the voluntary liquidation proceedings, including the declaration of solvency, appointment of voluntary liquidator, filing of accounts, and the....
The voluntary liquidation process and compliance with the Companies Act provisions were crucial in determining the dissolution of the company.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.