IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Manmohan, Asha Menon, JJ.
Babu Ram - Appellant
Versus
Union Of India & Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 895 of 2021
Decided On : 22-01-2021
Pro Rata Pension - Indian Air Force - The court directed the Indian Air Force to grant pro rata pension to the petitioner if found similarly placed as in previous cases, and to communicate reasons if not entitled to the pension.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought pro rata pension claiming to be similarly placed as in previous cases. The NOC had been given, and the respondents agreed to dispose of the petition subject to verification and right of appeal.
Finding of the Court:
The court directed the Indian Air Force to grant pro rata pension to the petitioner if found similarly placed as in previous cases, and to communicate reasons if not entitled to the pension. Non-payment of arrears would incur interest.
Issues: Verification of entitlement to pro rata pension, communication of reasons if not entitled, and payment of arrears with interest.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the petitioner's claim of being similarly placed as in previous cases, the NOC given, and the respondents' agreement subject to verification and right of appeal.
Final Decision: The court directed the Indian Air Force to grant pro rata pension to the petitioner if found similarly placed as in previous cases, and to communicate reasons if not entitled to the pension. Non-payment of arrears would incur interest.
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J. - The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner in this petition claims to be similarly placed to the petitioners in Brijlal Kumar v. Union of India and others,2020 SCCOnLineDel 1477 and the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India,2019 SCCOnLineDel 6425 (DB) [against which Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 8813/2019 has been dismissed on 26th April, 2019] and seeks the same relief as claimed therein i.e. of pro rata pension.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner in this petition, on enquiry, states that the requisite No Objection Certificate (NOC) had been given.
4. Learned counsel for the respondents fairly states that subject to the right to verification and the right of appeal to the Supreme Court against the judgment in Brijlal Kumar (supra) being saved, the petition be disposed of.
5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of directing the respondents Indian Air Force that within twelve weeks herefrom, if they find the petitioner to be similarly placed as the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra, to grant him the same relief as granted in those petitions i.e. by payment of arrears of pro rata pension from the date of discharge till the date of payment and in future to continue to pay pro rata pension to the petitioner. However, if on verification it is found that the petitioner, for any reason, is not entitled to pro rata pension for reasons other than those stated in the judgments in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra being in personam, the respondents, within the said twelve weeks, shall communicate to the petitioner, not so found entitled, the reasons in writing thereof and in which event, the petitioner shall be entitled to take further remedies there against.
6. If the arrears of pro rata pension are not paid within twelve weeks, the same shall also incur interest thereon @ 7% per annum from the expiry of twelve weeks till the date of payment.
7. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail.
The entitlement to pro rata pension was based on the petitioner being similarly placed as in previous cases, and the court directed the Indian Air Force to grant the pension if found entitled.
Entitlement to pro rata pension, verification of entitlement, provision for further remedies, and interest on delayed payment.
The court upheld the right to pro rata pension for similarly placed individuals and emphasized the requirement for communication of reasons if not entitled, allowing further remedies.
The court's decision was based on the entitlement of pro rata pension, verification of entitlement, communication of reasons for non-entitlement, and payment of arrears with interest.
The main legal point established is the entitlement to pro rata pension based on similarity to previous cases, communication of reasons if not entitled, and the payment of arrears with interest if no....
The court upheld the entitlement to pro rata pension for the petitioner, subject to verification and the right of appeal to the Supreme Court, and outlined the process for denial and further remedies....
The court's decision was influenced by the petitioner's claim to be similarly placed to other petitioners and sought the same relief of pro rata pension, along with the agreement of the respondents t....
Entitlement to pro rata pension hinges on similar circumstances established in prior rulings, requiring timely verification and communication from the governing body.
The petitioner is entitled to pro rata pension if found similarly placed as previous petitioners, with interest on delayed dues.
The court confirmed the right to verify eligibility for pro rata pension, mandating payments and establishing procedures for denied claims.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.