SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 1877

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Manmohan, Asha Menon, JJ.
Ex Cpl Lalit Kumar - Appellant
Versus
Union Of India & Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 89 of 2021, 114 of 2021; Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 274 of 2021, 342 of 2021
Decided On : 06-01-2021

Advocates appeared:
Baljeet Singh, Advocate, Deepika Sheoran, Advocate, Ruchir Mishra, Advocate, Mukesh Kumar Tiwari, Advocate, Nidhi Raman, Advocate, Uddhav Khanna, Advocate, Manpreet Kaur Bhasin, Advocate

The court's decision was based on the entitlement of pro rata pension, verification of entitlement, communication of reasons for non-entitlement, and payment of arrears with interest.

Headnote:

Pro Rata Pension - Indian Air Force - The court directed the Indian Air Force to grant pro rata pension to the petitioners if they are similarly placed as in previous cases, and to communicate reasons in writing if not found entitled, with the right to further remedies.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners sought pro rata pension claiming to be similarly placed as in previous cases and provided the requisite No Objection Certificates (NOCs).

Finding of the Court:

The court disposed of the petitions, directing the Indian Air Force to grant pro rata pension to the petitioners if similarly placed as in previous cases, and to communicate reasons in writing if not found entitled, with the right to further remedies. Non-payment of arrears of pro rata pension would incur interest.

Issues: Claim for pro rata pension, verification of entitlement, communication of reasons for non-entitlement, and payment of arrears with interest.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the petitioners' claim to be similarly placed as in previous cases, the submission of NOCs, and the direction to the Indian Air Force to grant pro rata pension if entitlement is verified.

Final Decision: The court directed the Indian Air Force to grant pro rata pension to the petitioners if similarly placed as in previous cases, and to communicate reasons in writing if not found entitled, with the right to further remedies. Non-payment of arrears of pro rata pension would incur interest.

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. - The petitions have been heard by way of video conferencing.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner/s states that all the petitioners in these petitions claim to be similarly placed to the petitioners in Brijlal Kumar v. Union of India and others connected petitions,2020 SCCOnLineDel 1477 and the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India,2019 SCCOnLineDel 6425 (DB) [against which Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 8813/2019 has been dismissed on 26th April, 2019] and seek the same relief as claimed therein i.e. of pro rata pension.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner/s in all these petitions, on enquiry, states that the requisite No Objection Certificates (NOCs) have been filed along with the petitions.

4. Learned counsels for the respondents fairly state that subject to the right to verification and the right to appeal to the Supreme Court against the judgment in Brijlal Kumar (supra) being saved, the petitions be disposed of.

5. Accordingly, the petitions are disposed of, directing the respondents Indian Air Force that within twelve weeks herefrom, if they find the petitioners to be similarly placed as the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra, to grant them the same relief as granted in those petitions i.e. by payment of arrears of pro rata pension from the date of discharge till the date of payment and in future to continue to pay pro rata pension to the petitioners. However, if on verification it is found that the petitioners or any of them, for any reason, are not entitled to pro rata pension for reasons other than those stated in the judgments in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra being in personam, the respondents, within the said 12 weeks, shall communicate to the petitioners, not so found entitled, the reasons in writing thereof and in which event, the petitioners shall be entitled to take further remedies there against.

6. If the arrears of pro rata pension are not paid within twelve weeks, the same shall also incur interest thereon @ 7% per annum from the expiry of twelve weeks till the date of payment.

7. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top