IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Manmohan, Asha Menon, JJ.
Shivashish Shubham - Appellant
Versus
Union Of India & Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 33 of 2021, 43 of 2021, 49 of 2021; Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 98 of 2021, 123 of 2021, 195 of 2021
Decided On : 06-01-2021
Pro Rata Pension - Indian Air Force - The court directed the Indian Air Force to grant pro rata pension to the petitioners if they are found to be similarly placed as in previous cases, and to communicate reasons in writing if not found entitled, with the option for further remedies.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners sought pro rata pension claiming to be similarly placed as in previous cases and provided the requisite No Objection Certificates (NOCs).
Finding of the Court:
The court disposed of the petitions directing the Indian Air Force to grant pro rata pension to the petitioners if similarly placed as in previous cases, and to communicate reasons in writing if not found entitled, with the option for further remedies.
Issues: Verification of entitlement to pro rata pension, communication of reasons if not entitled, and payment of arrears with interest if not paid within twelve weeks.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the verification of entitlement to pro rata pension, communication of reasons if not entitled, and the payment of arrears with interest if not paid within twelve weeks.
Final Decision: The Indian Air Force was directed to grant pro rata pension to the petitioners if similarly placed as in previous cases, and to communicate reasons in writing if not found entitled, with the option for further remedies. Arrears of pro rata pension were to incur interest if not paid within twelve weeks.
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J. - The petitions have been heard by way of video conferencing.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner/s states that all the petitioners in these petitions claim to be similarly placed to the petitioners in Brijlal Kumar v. Union of India and others connected petitions,2020 SCCOnLineDel 1477 and the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India,2019 SCCOnLineDel 6425(DB) [against which Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 8813/2019 has been dismissed on 26th April, 2019] and seek the same relief as claimed therein i.e. of pro rata pension.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner/s in all these petitions, on enquiry, states that the requisite No Objection Certificates (NOCs) have been filed along with the petitions.
4. Learned counsels for the respondents fairly state that subject to the right to verification and the right of appeal to the Supreme Court against the judgment in Brijlal Kumar (supra) being saved, the petitions be disposed of.
5. Accordingly, the petitions are disposed of directing the respondents Indian Air Force that within twelve weeks herefrom, if they find the petitioners to be similarly placed as the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra, to grant them the same relief as granted in those petitions i.e. by payment of arrears of pro rata pension from the date of discharge till the date of payment and in future to continue to pay pro rata pension to the petitioners. However, if on verification it is found that the petitioners or any of them, for any reason, are not entitled to pro rata pension for reasons other than those stated in the judgments in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra being in personam, the respondents, within the said twelve weeks, shall communicate to the petitioners, not so found entitled, the reasons in writing thereof and in which event, the petitioners shall be entitled to take further remedies there against.
6. If the arrears of pro rata pension are not paid within twelve weeks, the same shall also incur interest thereon @ 7% per annum from the expiry of twelve weeks till the date of payment.
7. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail.
The main legal point established is the entitlement to pro rata pension based on similarity to previous cases, communication of reasons if not entitled, and the payment of arrears with interest if no....
The court's decision was based on the entitlement of pro rata pension, verification of entitlement, communication of reasons for non-entitlement, and payment of arrears with interest.
The court's decision was based on the entitlement to pro rata pension, subject to verification and the right of appeal to the Supreme Court if entitlement is disputed.
The court affirmed the right to equal treatment under Article 14 for pension entitlements, directing payment of arrears if petitioners are similarly situated to prior beneficiaries.
Court mandated equal treatment for similarly situated individuals regarding pension entitlements, affirming verification rights and specifying interest on delayed payments.
The court upheld the right to pro rata pension for similarly placed individuals and emphasized the requirement for communication of reasons if not entitled, allowing further remedies.
The entitlement to pro rata pension was based on the petitioner being similarly placed as in previous cases, and the court directed the Indian Air Force to grant the pension if found entitled.
Entitlement to pro rata pension, verification of entitlement, provision for further remedies, and interest on delayed payment.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of the petitioners to pro rata pension in line with previous judgments.
Similar claimants must be granted equal pension rights based on verified eligibility against established legal precedents.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.