Back
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Ramesh Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State NCT Of Delhi – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Suresh Kumar Kait, J. - Vide the present petition, petitioner seeks direction thereby for quashing of FIR No.213/2020 dated 09.09.2020, registered at PS - Shaheen Bagh and all other proceedings arising therefrom.
2. Notice issued.
3. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by respondent no.2 present in person and with the consent of counsel for parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.
4. The present petition is filed on the ground that parties have settled their disputes and respondent no.2 has no objection if the present petition is allowed.
5. Respondent no.2 is personally present in Court and she has been identified by SI Ravinder Chander/IO and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.
6. Petitioner and respondent no.2 have entered into an amicable settlement.
7. Learned APP for State has opposed the present petition by stating that the petitioner has cheated respondent no.2 and misappropriated an amount of Rs. 1,20,000/-. Though after the FIR, during mediation the petitioner has paid an amount of Rs.2,50,000/- to the complainant but still the petitioner is alleged to have misled the complainan
The central legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to quash an FIR and consequent proceedings when the parties have entered into an amicable settlement and the complainant d....
The court may quash FIRs based on amicable settlements between parties, given no useful purpose in continued prosecution, while emphasizing accountability for allegations made.
The court established that an FIR can be quashed when parties amicably settle their disputes, provided there is no public interest in continuing the prosecution.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the court's discretion to quash an FIR based on an amicable settlement between the parties and the promotion of cordiality and harmony in the sa....
The court can quash an FIR and consequent proceedings if the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent does not wish to prosecute the matter further.
The court has the discretion to quash FIR and consequent proceedings if the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.
In cases of amicable settlement, a victim's non-objection to prosecution can justify quashing an FIR under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
The High Court possesses the inherent power to quash FIRs when the parties have settled their disputes amicably and continuation of prosecution serves no useful purpose.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the court has the discretion to quash FIR and consequent proceedings if the parties have settled their disputes and no useful purpose would....
Amicable settlements in criminal matters can lead to the quashing of FIRs if all parties consent and further prosecution serves no useful purpose.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
