Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Avnish Bansal – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing petition for quashing fir based on settlement. (Para 3 , 6 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. opposition to quashing due to public resources consumed. (Para 7) |
| 3. court's discretion in quashing fir based on contributions. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. final order to quash fir and dispose of the petition. (Para 13 , 14) |
CRL. M.A. 5076/2021
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. Application is disposed of.
CRL.M.C.998/2021
3. Vide the present petition, petitioner seeks direction thereby for quashing of FIR No.110/2018 dated 28.04.2018, registered at PS - Rani Bagh (North West), and all other proceedings arising therefrom.
4. Notice issued.
5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by counsel for respondent no.2 and with the consent of counsel for parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.
6. The present petition is filed on the ground that parties have settled their disputes and respondent Nos. 2 and 3 have no objection if the present petition is allowed.
7. Learned APP has opposed the present petition by submitting that there are 2 accused in the present case and this petition is qua petitioner herein. He further submits that
The court may quash FIRs based on amicable settlements between parties, given no useful purpose in continued prosecution, while emphasizing accountability for allegations made.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to quash an FIR and consequent proceedings when the parties have entered into an amicable settlement and the complainant d....
Amicable settlements between parties can justify quashing of FIRs when prosecution serves no useful purpose and the aggrieved party does not wish to continue.
A court may quash an FIR when parties have amicably settled their disputes, and prosecution serves no useful purpose.
Amicable settlement between parties can justify the quashing of an FIR when there is mutual consent and no objection from the affected party.
The court has the discretion to quash FIR and consequent proceedings if the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.
Court may quash FIR when parties amicably settle disputes and prosecution serves no useful purpose.
The court recognized the validity of amicable settlements in criminal cases, allowing for the quashing of FIRs when both parties agree to discontinue prosecution.
A High Court can quash an FIR when there is an amicable settlement between the parties that eliminates the necessity for prosecution.
Amicable settlements between parties may justify the quashing of FIRs when all parties agree, negating the necessity for continued prosecution.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
