Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Ramesh Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State NCT of Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. settlement of disputes between parties (Para 1 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. court's decision on quashing fir (Para 3 , 11) |
| 3. opposition to petition and assurance of compensation (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. quashing of fir based on circumstances (Para 12) |
| 5. conclusion of the case (Para 13 , 14) |
1. Vide the present petition, petitioner seeks direction thereby for quashing of FIR No.213/2020 dated 09.09.2020, registered at PS - Shaheen Bagh and all other proceedings arising therefrom.
2. Notice issued.
3. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by respondent no.2 present in person and with the consent of counsel for parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.
4. The present petition is filed on the ground that parties have settled their disputes and respondent no.2 has no objection if the present petition is allowed.
5. Respondent no.2 is personally present in Court and she has been identified by SI Ravinder Chander/IO and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.
6. Petitioner and respondent no.2 have entered into an amicable settlement.
7. Learned APP for State has opposed the presen
The court may quash FIRs based on amicable settlements between parties, given no useful purpose in continued prosecution, while emphasizing accountability for allegations made.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to quash an FIR and consequent proceedings when the parties have entered into an amicable settlement and the complainant d....
In cases of amicable settlement, a victim's non-objection to prosecution can justify quashing an FIR under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Amicable settlements in criminal matters can lead to the quashing of FIRs if all parties consent and further prosecution serves no useful purpose.
The High Court possesses the inherent power to quash FIRs when the parties have settled their disputes amicably and continuation of prosecution serves no useful purpose.
Amicable settlements between parties can justify quashing of FIRs when prosecution serves no useful purpose and the aggrieved party does not wish to continue.
A court may quash an FIR when parties have amicably settled their disputes, and prosecution serves no useful purpose.
An FIR can be quashed when parties amicably resolve their dispute and the complainant expresses a wish to withdraw, reinforced by imposed costs as a deterrent for future offenses.
FIR can be quashed when parties reach an amicable settlement and no further prosecution is warranted.
A High Court can quash an FIR when there is an amicable settlement between the parties that eliminates the necessity for prosecution.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
