Prem Sukh Bothra (huf) vs Office Of The Competent Authority

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(Del) 1902

MANMOHAN, ASHA MENON
Prem Sukh Bothra (huf) – Appellant
Versus
Office Of The Competent Authority – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Saurav Agarwal, Advocate, Yeeshu Jain, Advocate, Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate, Manish Mohan, Advocate, Manisha Saroha, Advocate, Sanjay Poddar, Advocate, Padma Priya, Advocate, Dhruv Nayar, Advocate, Shivam Goel, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. - C.M.No.32195/2020 in W.P.(C) 9361/2018 (for vacation or fixing the matter for final hearing by R-3)

C.M.No.32194/2020 in W.P.(C) 9417/2018 (for vacation or fixing the matter for final hearing by R-3)

Keeping in view the averments in the applications and with consent of parties, the matters are taken up for hearing.

Accordingly, the applicationsstand disposed of.

CM APPL. 32621/2019 in WP(C) 9372/2018 (by R-3)

Keeping in view the averments in the application, the delay in filing the reply to CM No. 12611/2019 is condoned.

Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

W.P. (C)9361/2018 & connected matter Page 4 of 17

W.P.(C) 9361/2018

W.P.(C) 9372/2018 & C.M.Nos.46518/2018 (for stay by petitioner)

W.P.(C) 9373/2018 & C.M.No.46523/2018 (for stay by petitioner)

W.P.(C) 9417/2018

1. Present writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners inter alia seeking appointment of an independent and impartial Arbitrator in accordance with Section 3G(5) and (6) of the National Highways Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') read with Arbitration and Conciliation Act,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2021 Supreme(Del) 1902

MANMOHAN, ASHA MENONPrem Sukh Bothra (huf) – AppellantVersusOffice Of The Competent Authority – Respondent

MANMOHAN, ASHA MENON
Prem Sukh Bothra (huf) – Appellant
Versus
Office Of The Competent Authority – Respondent