SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, ASHA MENON
Prem Sukh Bothra (HUF) – Appellant
Versus
Office of the Competent Authority – Respondent


Table of Content
1. writ petitions for independent arbitrator appointment. (Para 1)
2. contentions regarding current arbitrator's appointment. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
3. arguments for and against arbitrator's impartiality. (Para 5 , 6 , 8 , 10)
4. preference for district magistrate as arbitrator. (Para 7)
5. court's analysis of the appointment process. (Para 9 , 11 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
6. procedural correctness in arbitrator's appointment. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
7. dismissal of writ petitions based on established precedents. (Para 22)
8. court's final declarations and directions. (Para 23 , 24)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)

C.M.No.32195/2020 in W.P.(C) 9361/2018 (for vacation or fixing the matter for final hearing by R-3)

C.M.No.32194/2020 in W.P.(C) 9417/2018 (for vacation or fixing the matter for final hearing by R-3)

Keeping in view the averments in the applications and with consent of parties, the matters are taken up for hearing.

Accordingly, the applications stand disposed of.

CM APPL. 32621/2019 in WP(C) 9372/2018 (by R-3)

Keeping in view the averments in the application, the delay in filing the reply to CM No. 12611/2019 is condoned.

Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

W

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top