SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Del) 835

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Swarana Kanta Sharma, J.
Tarun & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
State (NCT Of Delhi) & Anr. - Respondents
Crl.M.C. 2828 of 2022
Decided On : 03-06-2022

Advocates appeared:
Mr. E.P. Pandey and, Mr. Nitin Upadhyay, Advocates, for the Appellant; Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State with ASI Jitender Kumar, P.S Baba Haridas Nagar, for the Respondent.

The central legal point established in the judgment is the importance of parties' free will in reaching a compromise, the need to curb the tendency of filing cases to settle scores, and the consideration of the interest of justice in allowing the quashing of the FIR.

Headnote:

Compromise - Quashing of FIR - The court allowed the quashing of the FIR after the parties involved reached a compromise and settled the dispute, emphasizing the importance of parties' free will and the need to curb the tendency of filing cases to settle scores.

Fact of the Case:

The petition was filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking the quashing of an FIR registered for various offenses under the Indian Penal Code. The parties had entered into a compromise and settlement deed, and the complainants expressed their desire not to pursue the matter.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the parties had amicably settled the dispute out of their own free will, without coercion, and emphasized the importance of curbing the tendency to file cases to settle scores. The court allowed the quashing of the FIR, subject to the accused persons depositing a sum of Rs. 10,000/- each in Lawyers' Welfare Fund.

Issues: The issues involved the quashing of the FIR, the settlement between the parties, and the delay in seeking compromise, consuming judicial time and time of the investigating agency.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the parties' compromise, the absence of coercion, and the importance of curbing the tendency to file cases to settle scores. The court also emphasized the need to consider the interest of justice in allowing the quashing of the FIR.

Final Decision: The court quashed the FIR and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, upon the parties' compromise and settlement, subject to the accused persons depositing a sum of Rs. 10,000/- each in Lawyers' Welfare Fund.

ORDER

CRL.M.A. 11694/2022 (exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exception.

2. The application stands disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 2828/2022

3. The instant petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed by the petitioner praying for quashing of FIR bearing No. 26/2017 registered at Police Station Baba Haridas Nagar, Delhi for offences punishable under Sections 354/452/506/509/354B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

4. Notice. Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State.

5. All the petitioners are present before this Court and have been identified by their counsel Mr E.P. Pandey and Investigating Officer (IO) ASI Jitender Kumar from Police Station Baba Haridas Nagar, Delhi.

6. On a query made by this Court, respondent no.2, who is present in Court and has been identified by the IO, has categorically stated that she has entered into compromise out of her own free will and without any pressure, coercion or threat. It is also stated by respondent No.2 that the entire dispute has been amicably settled between the parties vide Memorandum of Understanding (MoU)/Settlement Deed dated 21.02.2022 entered into between them and that she has no objection if the FIR is quashed.

7. Both the parties have appeared before this Court. The complainant states that the parties herein are neighbours and a dispute had arisen over some misunderstanding, pursuant to which the present cross FIRs have been registered. The cases were registered in the year 2017 and charges have already been framed. Thus, there has been a delay by the parties in coming to the Court for compromise for quashing of the FIRs, thereby consuming much judicial time and time of the investigating agency.

8. The tendency to file cases under Sections 354/509 in disputes between neighbours to settle scores is on the rise and needs to be curbed. The complainants in both the cases are present and state that they do not want to pursue the matter as the matter has been amicably settled. The parties have been cautioned and counselled. However, considering that the parties have amicably settled the dispute out of their own free will, and without any coercion, it will be in the interest of justice that the FIRs are quashed subject to the accused persons depositing a sum of Rs. 10,000/- each in Lawyers' Welfare Fund, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi and the receipt thereof be filed before the Registry of this Court within a week.

9. Accordingly, FIR bearing No. 26/2017, registered at Police Station Baba Haridas Nagar, Delhi for offences punishable under Sections 354/452/506/509/354B/34 of the IPC and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

10. The petition stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top