SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Del) 828

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Yashwant Varma, J.
Dr Prannoy Roy & Anr. - Appellantss
Versus
Union Of India & Ors. - Respondents
W.P.(C) 5316 of 2021
Decided On : 01-06-2022

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Advocate, with Ms. Anuradha Dutt, Mr. Pawan Sharma, Mr. Suman Yadav, Mr. Ambar Bhushan and, Mr. Nishant Varun, Advocates, for the Appellant; Mr. Chetan Sharma, ASG with, Mr. Anil Soni, Advocate, Mr. Anupam S. Sharrma, SPP, CBI with, Mr. Anurag K. and ley, Mr. Prakarsh Airan and Ms. Harpreet Kalsi, Advocates, for the Respondent.

The absence of chargesheet by CBI, lack of evidence indicating the petitioners as a flight risk, and their deep rooted ties in the country were considered as grounds for allowing the interim permission to travel abroad.

Headnote:

Look Out Circulars - Interim Permission to Travel Abroad - The court allowed the petitioners to travel abroad between 01 August 2022 to 30 August 2022, considering their deep rooted ties in the country and the absence of evidence indicating them as a flight risk or non-cooperation in the ongoing investigation.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners sought interim permission to travel abroad between 01 August 2022 to 30 August 2022 due to Look Out Circulars issued against them in relation to ongoing investigations. The court noted the absence of chargesheet by CBI and the petitioners' deep rooted ties in the country.

Finding of the Court:

The court allowed the application, permitting the petitioners to travel abroad between 01 August 2022 to 30 August 2022, based on the absence of evidence indicating them as a flight risk or non-cooperation in the ongoing investigation.

Issues: Interim permission to travel abroad, validity of Look Out Circulars, absence of chargesheet by CBI, petitioners' ties in the country.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the absence of chargesheet by CBI, lack of evidence indicating the petitioners as a flight risk, and their deep rooted ties in the country as grounds for allowing the interim permission to travel abroad.

Final Decision: The application was allowed, permitting the petitioners to travel abroad between 01 August 2022 to 30 August 2022, subject to specified conditions.

ORDER

CM APPL. 23632/2022 (Permission)

1. This application has been preferred by the petitioners for being accorded interim permission to travel abroad between 01 August 2022 to 30 August 2022 and time to time thereafter. Mr. Rohatgi, learned Senior Counsel appearing in support of the application has however submitted that the petitioners at this stage seek to restrict the permission sought for the month of August only.

2. The aforesaid prayer is addressed in the backdrop of Look Out Circulars [LOC] having been issued against the petitioners. The LOC in turn had come to be opened pursuant to the registration of two FIR's dated 2 June 2017 and 19 August 2019. The Court notes that although investigation is ongoing, till date no chargesheet has been filed by CBI. From the record the Court notes that an earlier LOC which had been issued had expired on 19 June 2020. A second LOC is thereafter stated to have been opened on 11 January 2021. Although Mr. Rohatgi contends that the aforesaid Circular would not subsist after the expiry of one year from the date of its issuance, the said contention is opposed by learned Counsel appearing for the CBI who contends that in terms of the Office Memorandum dated 22 February 2021, the LOC would continue to operate notwithstanding a period of one year having lapsed. The Court thus proceeds on the basis that the LOC of 11 January 2021 which had been opened still subsists.

3. The credentials of the petitioners are set forth in the application which has been moved. From the affidavit which has been tendered on behalf of the CBI, the Court notes that various allegations are levelled with respect to certain financial transactions which were undertaken by the petitioners in their capacity as being part of the management of New Delhi Television Ltd. However and as the record presently stands, the Court finds that the respondents do not place reliance on any material which may even remotely indicate that the petitioners constitute a flight risk. It is also not shown or established that they have failed to render cooperation in the ongoing investigation. From the material placed on behalf of the applicants, it is manifest that the petitioners have deep rooted ties in the country and consequently the prayer for interim permission as made would merit acceptance.

4. Accordingly the application is allowed. The petitioners shall consequently and in the interim be permitted to travel between 01 August 2022 to 30 August 2022, subject to the following conditions:-

(a) The petitioners shall file a requisite undertaking before the Registrar General of this Court that they shall return to the country not later than by 30 August, 2022.

(b) The petitioners will also furnish to the respondents a copy of the air tickets they have purchased for their travel, along with the complete itinerary of their stay abroad. The petitioners will also provide their phone numbers which would be used by them during their stay abroad, which numbers will be kept operational at all times.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top