YASHWANT VARMA
Shilpa Singh – Appellant
Versus
Vikas Khanna – Respondent
ORDER
1. This petition is directed against an order dated 02 April 2022 passed by the Family Judge granting visitation rights albeit supervised and in the concerned Court complex. The order is assailed with learned counsel contending that in light of the restraint which stood imposed by the Court dealing with the application made under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 ['PWDV'] and more particularly the order of 06 August 2021 made therein, the rights of limited visitation as granted by the Family Judge would not only be incongruous and incompatible but also wholly arbitrary and illegal.
2. Having heard learned counsel for parties this Court finds no ground to sustain the challenge on grounds addressed on the aforesaid lines for the following reasons.
3. The Court notes that the order passed under the PWDV was based upon the allegations which were made by the petitioner here against the husband. There was no allegation of cruelty or physical abuse levelled against the husband in relation to the children.
4. Bearing in mind the allegations that were laid by the petitioner the Court notes that the respondent here stood restrained from communicating with the childr
The PWDV Act is not a final remedy for custody and guardianship issues of a minor child, and the provisions of the PWDV Act and the Family Courts Act should be harmoniously construed.
The best interest of the child is paramount in custody matters, and a child's expressed wishes must be considered, especially when the child is of sufficient age to form a rational opinion.
DV Act – Domestic voilence - It is preponderance of probabilities while in criminal cases it is proof beyond reasonable doubt.
Custody of child – Child’s natural right to know and meet his parents is near perfect.
The court emphasized the discretionary power of the court in making interlocutory orders in matters of guardianship and wards, and the importance of considering the best interest of the minors.
Point Of Law : In the matters pertaining to custody of minor; welfare and interest of child to be given a paramount importance.
High Court is not vested with any unlimited prerogative to correct all kinds of hardship or wrong decisions made within limits of jurisdiction of subordinate courts or tribunals.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.