SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, DONADI RAMESH
Priyanka Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Abhishek Agarwal – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Diwakar Tiwari, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Heard Sri Diwakar Tiwari, learned counsel for the appellant and perused the record.

2. Present appeal has been filed against the order dated 27.05.2024 passed by the learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Court No. 2, Aligarh in Case No. 200 of 2023 (Abhishek Agarwal Vs. Priyanka Agarwal). By that order, pending the custody matter the learned court below has provided for visitation rights to the respondent to meet his child on one Sunday in a month that too for three hours at a public place.

3. Submission of learned counsel for the appellant that the said order is without jurisdiction is noted to be rejected. The child’s natural right to know and meet his parents is near perfect. To the extent the visitation right granted by the learned court below does not alter the status of the custody of the child and to the extent it is seen to be in the best interest of the child to continue to meet and know his father through limited interactions pending the custody matter, no interference is warranted in the present appeal.

4. All objections being raised by the appellant may remain to be examined and tested at the stage of final hearing of the proceeding.

5. Accordingly,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top