Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SASHIKANTA MISHRA
Rakesh Singh – Appellant
Versus
Poonam Singh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. custody dispute under pwdv act. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's analysis of custody orders. (Para 3) |
| 3. arguments by parties regarding custody. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. provisions under pwdv act analyzed. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. child's preference and welfare emphasized. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 6. final decision favoring father's custody. (Para 14 , 15) |
JUDGMENT :
SASHIKANTA MISHRA, J.
The petitioner questions the correctness of the order dated 11.07.2022 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jharsuguda in Criminal Revision Case No.17 of 2018 (treated as Appeal), whereby the order passed by learned S.D.J.M., Jharsuguda on 04.06.2018 in CMC No.79 of 2018 under Section 21 of PREVENTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT , 2005 (in short, the ‘PWDV Act’) was set aside. The present opposite party- had filed an application under Section 21 of the PWDV Act claiming temporary custody of her child residing with his father. While learned S.D.J.M. rejected the prayer, learned Additional Sessions Judge set aside the order of learned S.D.J.M. by directing the petitioner- husband to deliver custody of the child to his wife within 30 days.
2. The petitioner and the opposite party are husband and wi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
