JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. - I.a. 1653/2022 (Exemption)

allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

I.a. 1651/2022 (interim dir)

1. The applicant/respondent submits that the application has become infructuous.

2. accordingly, the application is dismissed as infructuous.

I.a. 1652/2022 (dir)

3. The applicant/respondent seeks leave to withdraw the application.

4. The application is dismissed as withdrawn.

Crl. M.a. 1871/2022 (under Section 340 Cr. P.C)

5. This is an application on behalf of the respondent under Section 340 Cr. P.C read with Section 195 Cr.P.C. It is contended by the respondent/applicant that petitioner have incorrectly claimed the respondent to be a wilful defaulter. He further submits that there is also an alleged illegal submission that there is a demand promissory note executed by the respondent.

6. Further it is contended that the petitioner has incorrectly alleged that there is schedule of repayment whereas there was no schedule of repayment agreed upon. Further it is alleged that certain documents have been manipulated.

7. This is a petition under Section 11(6) of the arbitration and Conciliation act, 1996 seeking appointment of an arbitrator. The contentions raised