IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Chandra Dhari Singh, J.
Vikas Kumar - Appellant
Versus
State Of NCT Of Delhi - Respondent
Bail Application No. 4293 of 2021
Decided On : 16-03-2022
NDPS - Bail Application - Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Sections 15, 61 and 85 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances act, 1985 - [15, 61, 85] - The court analyzed the provisions and objective of the NDPS act, specifically focusing on Section 37 which makes offences under the act cognizable and non-bailable. The court emphasized the stringent conditions for granting bail under the act, including the need for reasonable grounds to believe that the accused is not guilty of the offence and is not likely to commit a similar offence while on bail. The court referred to relevant case law and highlighted the gravity of drug trafficking offences and the legislative intent to prevent the devastating impact on society. The court concluded that the applicant did not satisfy the rigours of Section 37 and dismissed the bail application.
Fact of the Case:
The applicant sought regular bail in a case involving Sections 15, 61 and 85 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances act, 1985. The prosecution presented evidence of recovery of poppy husk and subsequent disclosure implicating the applicant as the source of the contraband. The applicant argued lack of nexus with the alleged offence, evasion of arrest due to false implication, and entitlement to bail based on parity with co-accused. The State opposed the bail application, emphasizing the gravity of the offence, the large quantity of contraband recovered, and the potential influence on witnesses if the applicant was released on bail.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the applicant did not satisfy the stringent conditions for granting bail under the NDPS act, specifically under Section 37. The court highlighted the gravity of drug trafficking offences and the legislative intent to prevent the devastating impact on society. The court concluded that the applicant did not satisfy the rigours of Section 37 and dismissed the bail application.
Issues: The issues involved the applicant's nexus with the alleged offence, evasion of arrest, entitlement to bail based on parity with co-accused, and the potential influence on witnesses if the applicant was released on bail.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the stringent conditions for granting bail under the NDPS act, including the need for reasonable grounds to believe that the accused is not guilty of the offence and is not likely to commit a similar offence while on bail. The court referred to relevant case law and highlighted the gravity of drug trafficking offences and the legislative intent to prevent the devastating impact on society.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the bail application, finding that the applicant did not satisfy the rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS act.
JUDGMENT
Chandra Dhari Singh, J. - The present application has been preferred under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Code') for seeking regular bail in FIR bearing No. 27/2019 under Sections 15, 61 and 85 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the 'NDPS act') registered at Police Station Wazirabad, Delhi.
2. The factual matrix in the instant case, as submitted by the prosecution, is as under:
a. On 5th February 2019, Ct. Robin Malik along with Ct. Kamaljit and Ct. Naushad was on patrolling duty in Wazirabad and at around 6 p.m. while they were near Sangam Vihar roundabout, two persons on a Splendor motorcycle bearing no. DL 8SVL 8959 of black and silver colour were seen with one blackish-grey plastic bag placed in between them, coming from the side of Jagatpur village. The two individuals upon sighting the police party tried to escape by taking a U-turn and were intercepted by the police officials and asked to show the contents of the plastic katta.
b. The katta was in a sealed condition which upon being torn was found to contain poppy husk. The person driving the motorcycle was identified to be Sunny Sharma and the pillion rider was Vijay Kumar. Information of the chance recovery was transmitted to the Police Station, upon which police team arrived at the spot.
c. The accused were informed of their rights, and the recovered katta was found to weigh 25 kgs, samples were drawn, and the two accused from whose possession intermediate quantity of poppy husk was recovered were arrested.
d. In the course of investigation, the two accused apprehended with the poppy husk, in custody, made disclosure naming the accused-applicant as the source of the contraband and divulged details of the godown situated at Khasra No 1001, Gail No 26, Village Jagatpur, Delhi where the poppy straw was stored by the supplier.
e. In pursuance thereto one raiding team including the SHO, reached at the disclosed address, where two rooms were found locked which were broken open and from one room one weighing machine, one grinding machine, were taken into police possession and from the other room 975.5 Kilograms of Poppy straw was seized which was found lying on the ground and was filled into 39 plastic gunny bags of 25kgs each, samples were drawn and sent to FSL.
f. after investigation of the case, Final Report was submitted in the Hon'ble Court against accused Vijay Kumar and Sunny Sharma. Supplementary chargesheet dated 25th September 2019 was filed in the Court with the FSL Report as well as the statement of the owner of the premises from where commercial quantity of contraband was recovered.
g. as per the statement of Chander Deep, Jyoti being the wife of Vikas had befriended his wife, and were living in the same locality for past two years. Jyoti had asked his wife for taking the premises in question on rent as her husband was in the masala business and needed some place to set up a grinding machine. Due to past acquaintance, he had agreed, and the premises were let out on 1st February 2019 for a monthly rent of Rs.5000/- and that he had to go out of station being a driver by profession due to which the rent agreement had not yet been drawn up.
h. During the course of investigation, the accused Vikas Kumar S/o Sh Ramesh Kumar R/o Village Mubarikhpur, Ward No 9, Tehsil Farrukhnagar, Distt Gurugram, Haryana was declared proclaimed offender in the present case on 7th June 2019. Subsequently, on 20th March 2021, the applicant surrendered in the Hon'ble Court and was arrested after taking necessary permission from the Hon'ble Court.
i. after investigation, supplementary charge sheet qua the applicant Vikas Kumar under Section 15/29 of the NDPS act & Section 174a of the IPC was filed in the concerned Court. On 15th December 2021, charge under Section 15 (b)/15 (c) & 29 of NDPS act has been framed against the applicant from the Hon'ble Court of Special Judge, NDP
Union of India vs. Md. Nawaz Khan (2021) 10 SCC 100
The main legal point established in the judgment is the stringent conditions for granting bail under the NDPS act, specifically under Section 37, which require reasonable grounds to believe that the ....
The judgment establishes the stringent parameters for granting bail under the NDPS Act, emphasizing the need to satisfy reasonable grounds for believing in the innocence of the accused and ensuring t....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the stringent parameters for granting bail under the NDPS Act, emphasizing the gravity of drug trafficking offences and the legislative intent to p....
The court ruled that bail under the NDPS Act requires clear evidence of innocence and no likelihood of reoffending, emphasizing the serious nature of drug trafficking.
A bail application under NDPS Act must meet stringent conditions, proving reasonable grounds for the accused's innocence and likelihood of non-reoffending, reflecting legislative intent to combat dru....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the stringent conditions for granting bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, especially for offences involving commercial quantity of contraband su....
The court denied bail under the NDPS Act due to the serious nature of drug trafficking charges and failure to meet statutory conditions, emphasizing public safety and legislative intent.
The court held that bail cannot be granted under the NDPS Act without satisfying the statutory requirements of demonstrating that the accused is not guilty of the offence and is unlikely to commit fu....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the stringent parameters for granting bail under the NDPS Act, as prescribed by Section 37, and the court's need to be satisfied on reasonable grou....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.