IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
DIVYESH A. JOSHI, J.
Tunna Kabiraj Swai – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
Criminal Misc. Application No. 2062 of 2024
Decided On : 14-03-2024
NDPS Act - Regular Bail - Section 8(c), 20(B), ii (C) and 29 - Section 37 - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the provisions of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, which makes offences under the Act cognizable and non-bailable, and sets conditions for granting bail. The court analyzed the legislative intent and the stringent parameters for granting bail under the Act. It also referred to relevant case laws to interpret the term 'reasonable grounds' and emphasized the gravity of drug trafficking offences and the need to prevent their devastating impact on society.
Fact of the Case:
The prosecution alleged that the accused persons were involved in storing and trafficking a commercial quantity of contraband substance Ganja. The applicant-accused sought bail, claiming innocence and lack of criminal antecedents.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the accused's involvement in a large-scale drug trafficking operation, the commercial quantity of Ganja involved, and the legislative intent of the NDPS Act warranted denial of bail. The court emphasized the gravity of the offence and the potential impact on society, and rejected the bail application.
Issues: The main issue was whether the applicant-accused should be granted bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, considering the gravity of the offence and the legislative intent of the Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the interpretation of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, the legislative intent to curb drug trafficking, and the gravity of the offence. The court emphasized the need to prevent the devastating impact of drug trafficking on society and the stringent parameters for granting bail under the Act.
Final Decision: The court rejected the bail application, stating that the conditions stipulated under Section 37 of the NDPS Act were not satisfied and there were no 'reasonable grounds' to presume the accused as not being guilty of the offence.
JUDGMENT :
DIVYESH A. JOSHI, J.
1. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned APP waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent-State.
2. The present application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for regular bail in connection with the FIR being C.R. No. 11214021210985 of 2021 registered with the Kosamba Police Station, Surat Rural of the offence punishable under Sections 8(c), 20(B), ii (C) and 29 of the NDPS Act.
3. The case of the prosecution, in brief, may be summarized as under:
3.2 Thereafter, a written report about the said secret information was prepared and forwarded to the Superintendent of Police, Surat. Then, after following all necessary procedure of raid and drawing panchnamas, they left for the place under information and reached there at around 10:30. On reaching the place, five persons were found to be there inside the shop who were asked to come out from the shop by the police in the presence of the Panchas. After that, the superior officer introduced himself as well as the other police staff and the Panchas to the said persons, and upon asking their identities, they identified themselves as (i) Tunna Kabiraj Sawai (ii) Dipak Trinath Pushti (iii) Satishsingh @ Shiva Rambirsingh Gurjar (iv) Surendra @ Vijay Kishandev Prasad and (v) Navdhan @ Navin Khaliya Pradhan.
3.3 Thereafter, all the accused persons were acquainted about the secret information that they have illegally stored the psychotropic substance Ganja in the shop owned and occupied by them. After that, requisite procedure under Sections 42 and 50 of the NDPS Act was also followed and when entered into the shop keeping the accused persons with them, 16 filled plastic sacks were found to be lying there in a top of each condition. When checked all the sacks one by one, some suspicious leafy substance having pungent smell was found from the same. Personal search of all the accused persons were also made, however, nothing objectionable was found upon their personal search.
3.4 Thereafter, samples were taken and the officers of the FSL were also called for and upon testing with the drug detection kit, the samples tested positive for Ganja. Thereafter, all the accused persons also confessed about the other cache of contraband substance kept by them at the G.I.D.C. Navapara and upon such admission being made, police went to the said place and recovered 21 more plastic sacks filled with contraband substance Ganja. Hence, the present FIR.
4. Learned advocate Mr. H.D. Rajput appearing for the applicant has submitted that the applicant-accused is an innocent young man, aged about 28 years languishing in jail since 18.08.2021. It is further submitted that the investigation
Durand Didier vs. Chief Secretary, Union Territory of Goa
The main legal point established in the judgment is the stringent conditions for granting bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, especially for offences involving commercial quantity of contraband su....
The court denied bail under the NDPS Act due to the serious nature of drug trafficking charges and failure to meet statutory conditions, emphasizing public safety and legislative intent.
The court ruled that bail under the NDPS Act requires clear evidence of innocence and no likelihood of reoffending, emphasizing the serious nature of drug trafficking.
The judgment establishes the stringent parameters for granting bail under the NDPS Act, emphasizing the need to satisfy reasonable grounds for believing in the innocence of the accused and ensuring t....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the stringent conditions for granting bail under the NDPS act, specifically under Section 37, which require reasonable grounds to believe that the ....
The main legal principle established in the judgment is the stringent conditions for granting bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act in drug trafficking cases, emphasizing the gravity of the offence, ....
The court emphasized that bail for drug offenses requires proof of innocence and likelihood of non-reoffending, in line with stringent statutory provisions to combat drug trafficking.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.