IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Prateek Jalan, J.
Shaheed Teg Bhadur College Of Pharmacy - Appellant
Versus
Pharmacy Council Of India - Respondent
Civil Writ Petition No. 10972, 12348, 12957, 13293, 13307, 13319, 13440, 13442 of 2019, 13659, 13834, 13924, 13963, 6795 of 2020, 7331 of 2020, 6643 of 2020, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 182, 183, 184, 185, 188, 189, 190, 191, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 206, 212, 213, 215, 217, 218, 219, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 239, 240, 241, 242, 244, 245, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 259, 260, 262, 264, 265, 269, 270, 271, 274, 279, 280, 282, 283, 284, 288, 314, 321 of 2021, Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 55847 of 2019, 27116, 18210, 18219, 28148, 18213, 18225, 25303- 25304, 18318, 25378- 25379, 19848-19849, 23627, 24645-47 of 2020, 525, 526, 530 532, 533, 534, 537-539, 540, 541, 542, 545, 546, 547, 548, 549, 550, 551, 552, 553, 554, 555, 559, 568, 569, 572, 574, 576, 579, 610, 620, 621, 622, 623, 625, 627, 629, 645, 649, 651, 667, 674, 724, 23138-40, 2369, 2316 of 2021
Decided On : 07-03-2022
PHARMACY ACT, 1948 - SECTION 10, 12, 18 - ARTICLE 19(1)(G), 19(6) - CONSTITUTION OF INDIA - PHARMACY COUNCIL OF INDIA [PCI] - MORATORIUM ON ESTABLISHMENT OF NEW PHARMACY COLLEGES - IMPOSITION - LEGALITY - HELD, IMPOSITION OF MORATORIUM BY PCI BY WAY OF EXECUTIVE DECISION WITHOUT FRAMING REGULATIONS UNDER SECTION 10 OF THE ACT IS ILLEGAL AND VOID.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, desirous of establishing pharmacy colleges, challenged the communications dated 17.07.2019 and 09.09.2019 issued by the respondent/ Pharmacy Council of India [PCI] imposing a moratorium on the opening of new pharmacy colleges for a period of five years with effect from the academic year 2020-21. The PCI communicated a decision taken at its meeting held on 09/10.04.2019 to impose a moratorium on the opening of new pharmacy colleges for a period of five years with effect from the academic year 2020-21. The letter dated 09.09.2019 conveyed the resolution taken at the meeting held on 05/06.08.2019, providing certain exemptions to the aforesaid moratorium.
Finding of the Court:
The Court held that the impugned decisions of the PCI dated 17.07.2019 and 09.09.2019 are set aside. The writ petitions are allowed in the aforesaid terms, but without any order of costs.
Issues: 1. Whether the PCI can impose a moratorium on the establishment of new pharmacy colleges by way of an executive decision without framing Regulations under Section 10 of the Pharmacy Act, 1948? 2. Whether the impugned decisions of the PCI are violative of the fundamental right to establish and administer an educational institution under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The Court held that the PCI cannot impose a moratorium on the establishment of new pharmacy colleges by way of an executive decision without framing Regulations under Section 10 of the Pharmacy Act, 1948. The Court relied on the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in Krupanidhi Education Trust (Regd.) and anr. vs. The Secretary, Pharmacy Council of India and Ors. aIR 1992 Delhi 238, wherein it was held that a policy decision of the PCI to disallow any increase in the number of seats in a pharmacy college, by way of a general policy decision dated 12.12.1989, would have to form part of the Education Regulations, with compliance of the requirements of Section 10 of the Act. 2. The Court held that the impugned decisions of the PCI are violative of the fundamental right to establish and administer an educational institution under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India. The Court relied on the decisions of the Supreme Court in T.M.a. Pai Foundation & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka & Ors. [(2002) 8 SCC 481], Islamic academy of Education & anr. vs. State of Karnataka & Ors. (2003) 6 SCC 697, and P.a Inamdar & Ors. vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. [(2005) 6 SCC 537], wherein it was held that the right to establish an educational institution is a fundamental right under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.
Final Decision: The Court allowed the writ petitions and set aside the impugned decisions of the PCI dated 17.07.2019 and 09.09.2019.
JUDGMENT
Prateek Jalan, J. - This batch of 88 writ petitions is directed against communications dated 17.07.2019 and 09.09.2019 addressed by the respondent/ Pharmacy Council of India [hereinafter, 'PCI'] to State Governments and Union Territory administrations. [The same communications have also been challenged in approximately 2500 other writ petitions, in which orders will be passed separately.] By the impugned letter dated 17.07.2019, the PCI communicated a decision taken at its meeting held on 09/10.04.2019 to impose a moratorium on the opening of new pharmacy colleges for a period of five years with effect from the academic year 2020-21. The letter dated 09.09.2019 conveyed the resolution taken at the meeting held on 05/06.08.2019, providing certain exemptions to the aforesaid moratorium.
Facts
2. The writ petitions proceed on a substantially similar factual basis. The petitioners claim to be desirous of establishing pharmacy colleges, for which they require prior approval of the PCI. It is stated that the petitioners procured land and physical infrastructure required prior to submission of their applications. In the normal course, they would have been required to submit applications for establishment of colleges in the year 2020-21 in October/ November of the preceding year. However, their applications could not be submitted due to the impugned decision of the PCI.
3. In the present batch of petitions, the extent of investment in land and infrastructure has not been clearly elaborated, except for a statement in one of the writ petitions [W.P.(C) 10972/2019] to the effect that the petitioner's investment amounts to Rs. 2.5 crores, including a building of approximately 15,000 sq. ft.
Impugned communications of the PCI
4. Before adverting to the contentions of the parties, it is necessary to appreciate the scope and effect of the impugned communications. In the letter dated 17.07.2019, the PCI noted that establishment of six different courses of varying durations were being approved by it under Section 12 of the Pharmacy act, 1948 [hereinafter, 'the act'], and thereafter adverted to the decision taken in the meeting of 09/10.04.2019, to place a moratorium on establishment of new pharmacy colleges. The relevant extracts of the communication dated 17.07.2019 read as follows:-
' xxxx xxxx xxxx
During the 106th Central Council meeting of the PCI held on 9th& 10th april, 2019, a concern was expressed about the mushrooming of pharmacy colleges in the country. The issue was threadbarely deliberated. It was noted that-
a) There are approximately 1,985 D.Pharm and 1,439 B.Pharm institutes in the country. The annual intake of students in these institutes (both D.Pharm and B.Pharm) is 2,19,279.
b) This available workforce is enough to meet the current pharmacist-to-population needs of the country.
c) The rapid increase in the number of pharmacy colleges over the last decade may result in shortage of trained and qualified teaching faculty which may affect the quality of education imparted to students.
d) The pass out students are not getting reasonably paid job opportunities in public as well as in private sector.
Considering the above facts, the House passed the following resolution unanimously:-
RESOLUTION
'Taking into consideration the availability of sufficient qualified pharmacist work force, the House unanimously resolved to put a moratorium on the opening of new pharmacy colleges for running Diploma as well as Degree course in pharmacy for a period of five years beginning from the academic year 2020-2021. This moratorium shall not be applicable in the North Eastern region of the country where there is a shortage of pharmacy colleges.'
The said Resolution has been communicated to Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India on 17.7.2019 for information under intimation to all India Council for Technical Education (aICTE) and also posted on the Council's website.' Emphasis supplied.
5. The communication dated 09.09.2019 was stated
Shrimati Hira Devi & Ors. vs. District Board, Shahjahanpur (1952) SCR 1122
State of Bihar & Ors. vs. Project Uchcha Vidya
Ramchandra Keshav Adke (Dead) by LRs & Ors. vs. Govind Joti Chavare & Ors (1975) 1 SCC 559
Rai Sahib Ram Jawaya Kapur & Ors. vs. The State of Punjab (1955) 2 SCR 225 : AIR 1955 SC 549
P.A Inamdar & Ors. vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. (2005) 6 SCC 537
Nazir Ahmad vs. The King-Emperor AIR 1936 PC 253 : LR 63 IA 372
Modern School vs. Union of India & Ors. (2004) 5 SCC 583
Medical Council of India vs. State of Karnataka & Ors (1998) 6 SCC 131
Laurel Energetics Private Ltd. vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India (2017) 8 SCC 541
Islamic Academy of Education & Anr. vs. State of Karnataka & Ors. (2003) 6 SCC 697
Forum for Promotion of Quality Education for All, Action Committee
Ashok Kumar Das & Ors. vs. University of Burdwan & Ors. (2010) 3 SCC 616
Union of India vs. Elphinstone Spinning and Weaving Co. Ltd. & Ors. (2001) 4 SCC 139
Tribhuban Parkash Nayyar vs. Union of India (1969) 3 SCC 99
T.M.A. Pai Foundation vs. State of Karnataka (2002) 8 SCC 481
T.M.A. Pai Foundation & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka & Ors. (2002) 8 SCC 481
State of Madhya Pradesh & Anr. vs. Thakur Bhagat Singh (1967) 2 SCR 454 : AIR 1967 SC 1170
The PCI cannot impose a moratorium on the establishment of new pharmacy colleges by way of an executive decision without framing Regulations under Section 10 of the Pharmacy Act, 1948. The impugned d....
Opening of new Pharmacy Colleges – Merely because an institution has a right to establish an educational institution does not mean that such an application has to be allowed – In a particular area, i....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Pharmacy Council of India's decision to impose a moratorium on opening new pharmacy colleges for a period of five years was not permissibl....
The State lacks competence to impose a ban on NOCs for educational institutes via executive order, which violates fundamental rights under Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.
Non-speaking orders and lack of opportunity to rectify deficiencies in the approval process for pharmacy colleges, and the need for compliance with statutory provisions under the Pharmacy Act, 1948.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the exclusive authority of the Pharmacy Council of India (PCI) in regulating pharmacy education, as per the provisions of the Pharmacy Act, 1948. T....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.