SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Del) 1435

PRATHIBA M. SINGH
Satula Devi – Appellant
Versus
Govt. Of NCT Of Delhi – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Vikas Singh, Advocate, Varun Singh, Advocate, Deepeika Kalia, Advocate, Kapish Seth, Advocate, Mrityunjay Singh, Advocate, Alankrit Dwivedi, Advocate, Akshay Dev, Advocate, Abhijeet Pandey, Advocate, Ytharth Kumar, Advocate, Anupam Srivastava, Advocate, Vasuh Misra, Advocate, K.K. Rai, Advocate, Anshul Rai, Advocate, S.K. Pandey, Advocate, Chandrashekhar AC, Advocate, Awanish Kumar, Advocate, Sreoshi Chatterjee, Advocate, Mahesh Jethmalani, Advocate, Ravi Sharma, Advocate, Anjani Kumar Rai, Advocate, Gunjan Mangla, Advocate, Madhullika Rai Sharma, Advocate, Dr. Abhishek Singhvi, Advocate, B. Shravanth Shanker, Advocate, Sandeep Sethi, Advocate, D. Abhinav Rao, Advocate, Umesh Sharma, Advocate, Sanjeev Sagar, Advocate, Nazia Parveen, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. - This hearing has been done through video conferencing.

CM aPPL.171/2022 in W.P.(C) 9643/2018

2. This petition relates to guardianship which was sought in respect of a senior citizen who is referred to, since inception, as Mr. DMP, who was a Member of Parliament and was diagnosed with `fronto-temporal dementia'. The guardianship sought by the Petitioner/Mrs. Satula Devi (hereinafter 'Mrs. SD') - i.e., Mr. DMP's wife, was vehemently contested by other family members of Mr. DMP and the petition was heard by this Court from time to time. Mrs. SD was supported by her two sons - Respondent No. 4/Mr. Rajiv Sharma (hereinafter 'Mr. RS'), Respondent No.3/Mr. Ranjit Sharma (hereinafter 'Mr. RJS') and their respective families. However, Respondent No.5/Ms. Uma Devi (hereinafter 'Ms. UD'), who was Mr. DMP's companion, Intervener/Mr. Umesh Sharma (hereinafter 'Mr. US')- Mr. DMP's brother, and Respondent No.6/Mrs. Kanchana Rai (hereinafter 'Mrs. KR'), - Mr. DMP's daughter-in-law whose husband was the deceased third son of Mr. DMP, and her sons were opposing the present writ petition.

3. In the writ petition, the legal position emerging from the two statutes i.e., The

                  Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                  1
                  2
                  3
                  4
                  5
                  6
                  7
                  8
                  9
                  10
                  11
                  SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                  supreme today icon
                  logo-black

                  An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                  Please visit our Training & Support
                  Center or Contact Us for assistance

                  qr

                  Scan Me!

                  India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                  For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                  whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
                  whatsapp-icon Back to top