IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
Satula Devi – Appellant
Versus
Govt. Of NCT Of Delhi And Ors. - Respondents
W.P.(C) 1271 of 2020 & CM APPLs. 697 of 2022, 9891 of 2022, 30096 of 2022
Decided on : 11-07-2022
Guardianship - Senior Citizen - Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 - Section 41(4), 22, 23, 274 - The court appointed a Sole Guardian to safeguard the assets of the deceased senior citizen, Mr. DMP, and issued various directions to ensure compliance and prevent misuse of assets.
Fact of the Case:
The writ petition related to the guardianship of a senior citizen diagnosed with dementia. The court appointed a Sole Guardian to oversee the deceased senior citizen's assets and issued directions to safeguard the assets.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the appointment of a Sole Guardian was necessary to prevent the frittering away or misuse of the deceased senior citizen's substantial assets.
Issues: The main issue was the guardianship of the senior citizen and the safeguarding of his substantial assets after his demise.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on Section 41(4) of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, and issued directions to ensure compliance and prevent misuse of the deceased senior citizen's assets.
Final Decision: The court disposed of the applications, affirmed the appointment of the Sole Guardian, and directed that the appointed directions shall continue until modified by a competent court.
Key Points: - Appointment of Sole Guardian to safeguard assets of the deceased senior citizen and related directions (!) (!) (!) - Continuation of orders and safeguards after demise; guardianship to continue until modified by competent court (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) - Status quo on movable/immovable assets, banking operations, and prior approvals required for expenses or transfers (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) - Report and accountability requirements by Sole Guardian; monitoring of compliance with earlier directions (!) (!) (!) (!) - Remuneration and governance of the Sole Guardian and related personnel (!) (!) (!) - Proceedings and continuation of related legal actions and remedies in light of guardianship status (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!)
JUDGMENT :
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
1. The present writ petition relates to guardianship which was sought in respect of a senior citizen who is referred to, since inception, as Mr. DMP, who was a Member of Parliament and was diagnosed with ‘fronto-temporal dementia’. The guardianship sought by the Petitioner/Mrs. Satula Devi (hereinafter “Mrs. SD”) – i.e., Mr. DMP’s wife, was vehemently contested by other family members of Mr. DMP and the petition was heard by this Court from time to time. Mrs. SD was supported by her two sons – Respondent No.4/Mr. Rajiv Sharma (hereinafter “Mr. RS”), Respondent No.3/Mr. Ranjit Sharma (hereinafter “Mr. RJS”) and their respective families. However, Respondent No.5/Ms. Uma Devi (hereinafter “Ms. UD”), who was Mr. DMP’s companion, Intervener/Mr. Umesh Sharma (hereinafter “Mr. US”)– Mr. DMP’s brother, and Respondent No.6/Mrs. Kanchana Rai (hereinafter “Mrs. KR”), - Mr. DMP’s daughter-in-law whose husband was the deceased third son of Mr. DMP, and her sons were opposing the present writ petition.
2. The present writ petition was disposed of vide judgment dated 29th October, 2021, whereby Justice (Retd.) Rajiv Sahai Endlaw was appointed as the Supervising Guardian along with a Guardianship Committee to take care of Mr. DMP and his financial affairs. Subsequently, on 6th January, 2022, this Court was informed of Mr. DMP’s demise on 27th December, 2021. Various disputes between the family members had also been cited on the said date and there were allegations of utilization of Mr. DMP’s assets by the contesting Respondents. Accordingly, vide order dated 6th January 2022, Justice (Retd.) Rajiv Sahai Endlaw was appointed as the Sole Guardian of Mr. DMP and the Guardianship Committee was disbanded. Various directions were issued vide the said order. The same are as under:
(i) In view of the fact that Mr. DMP is no more, the Guardianship Committee shall stand disbanded and Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw (Retd.), shall act as the Sole Guardian for the estate and all assets of Mr. DMP henceforth. He shall exercise the same powers mutatis mutandis, as those of the Supervising Guardian and the Guardianship Committee, in terms of order dated 29th October, 2021. Mr. T.R. Narayanan and Mr. Shrinath Banerjee, Personal Assistants of Mr. DMP, and all parties, shall now proceed strictly in accordance with the instructions given by the Sole Guardian in respect of the assets of Mr. DMP.
(ii) A report shall be placed before this Court, by Justice Endlaw (Retd.), within a period of two weeks, in respect of the following aspects:
(a) Whether the various directions concerning Mr. DMP and his assets, passed by this Court have been complied with or not in terms of the Court’s earlier orders and the directions given by him?
(b) The minutes of proceedings containing the directions issued by him from time to time shall be placed on record along with the report.
(c) Current status of the movable and immovable assets of Mr. DMP, including his bank accounts, fixed deposits, shares and any other investments.
(d) Any further documents/actions which may be required in order to safeguard the moveable and immovable assets of Mr. DMP.
(iii) Since the
The main legal point established is the court's authority to appoint a Sole Guardian under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, to safeguard the assets of a deceased senior citizen and issue directions....
A guardian's authority endures post the ward's death to prevent asset dissipation amidst disputes, as established under Section 41(4) of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890.
The court exercised parens patriae jurisdiction to appoint an interim guardian for a mentally incapacitated individual, establishing the importance of safeguarding the assets and medical decisions fo....
The court reaffirmed the principle that guardianship for mentally ill persons should prioritize family relationships, allowing spouses and immediate relatives to jointly manage health and financial a....
A guardian appointed under the Rights of the Persons with Disabilities Act has authority to manage and transfer property on behalf of the individual deemed unfit, without additional procedural constr....
Old/sick/incapacitated bank customers - Person who would be entitled to operate his bank account and can be appointed as guardian to the person.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.