PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
ARUN PALLI, VIKRAM AGGARWAL
Gurpreet Kaur Maini – Appellant
Versus
UT of Chandigarh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges by the appellant regarding property sale authority. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. petitioner's application involves identifying legal guardianship for property management. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court emphasizes procedural justice for vulnerable individuals. (Para 10 , 12 , 19) |
JUDGMENT :
Vikram Aggarwal, J.
1. The petitioner assails the communication dated 23.07.2024 (Annexure P-12) issued by respondent No.2 vide which, with reference to the request made by the petitioner to sell house No.42, Sector 11-A, Chandigarh (50% of which is owned by the petitioner and 50% by her husband-Jivtesh Singh Maini and who is mentally and physically unfit) (hereinafter referred to as the 'subject property'), she has been advised to approach the competent Court under Order XXXII of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short 'CPC') for seeking permission to sell 50% share of her husband. She further prays for the issuance of a mandamus to the respondents to accord the necessary permission to her in terms of the judgment dated 31.05.2024 passed by the Court of Principal District and Sessions Judge, South District, Saket Courts, New Delhi (for short 'Delhi Court') under Section 14 of t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.