SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Del) 1973

SANJEEV NARULA
Maa Harsiddhi Infra Developers Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Mahavir Transmission Limited – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Narula, J. (Oral)--The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [hereinafter "the Act"] is directed against an award dated 4th December, 2021, passed by Retd. Mr. Justice Pradeep Nandrajog, former Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court (Sole Arbitrator), whereby the claims of the Respondent (Claimant in arbitration) were allowed and the counter claims of the Petitioner stood rejected.

The Facts

2. Petitioner was awarded a turnkey contract by Tripura State Electricity Corporation Ltd. [hereinafter "the TSECL"] to create additional power infrastructure in the State of Tripura under the scheme of Deen Dayal Upadhaya Gram Jyoti Yojana under the aegis of the Ministry of Power, Govt. of India. For this purpose, Petitioner required 4500 KM of ACSR (Aluminium Conductors with Steel Reinforced) Dog Conductors [hereinafter referred to as `conductors'] and Respondent, being a manufacturer and supplier of the said Conductors, negotiated a supply contract with the Petitioner. Petitioner issued four Purchase Orders on the Respondent for a total amount of Rs.30,47,94,000/- for purchase of 4500 kms of conductors which were to be delivered in fo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top