Back
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
Bawana Infra Development Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Delhi State Industrial & Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited ("dsiidc") – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Chandra Dhari Singh, J.
1. The instant petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:
"In view of the facts, grounds and circumstances stated above, this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to:
(i) allow the present application and set aside the Impugned Award dated 12.09.2018 passed by the Ld. Sole Arbitrator, received by the Applicant on 19.09.2018 and;
(ii) pass such other further order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the aforesaid facts and circumstances."
FACTUAL MATRIX
2. The petition has been filed against the impugned Award dated 12th September 2018 passed by Justice R.C. Jain(Retd.), the learned Sole Arbitrator. The Arbitration proceedings in the current matter arose out of Concessionaire Agreement with respect to the re-development, operation, and maintenance of the 'Bawana Industrial Area' (hereinafter referred to as the "Project Area") situated in Delhi.
3. The facts necessary for the disposal of this instant petition are that the petitioner M/s Bawana Infra Development Private Limited, was a spec
The Court held that the impugned award with respect to Claim 7 was not well-reasoned as required by the Act under Section 31(3), and the impugned award with respect to the award in Claim 11 is contra....
The Court held that the learned Arbitrator had erred in decreeing the award with respect to the rate of interest, and hence, the Award qua issue no. 20 with regards to the rate of interest is liable ....
The limited scope of intervention by Courts in arbitral awards under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, emphasizing the need to satisfy specific grounds for setting aside an arbitral....
Employees are entitled to wage arrears from 01.01.1997 despite a Presidential Directive limiting payments, as the directive was deemed unjustified by the Tribunal.
Limited grounds for interference with an Arbitral Award under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act
The court upheld the validity of the arbitral award, emphasizing limited grounds for judicial interference and the necessity of demonstrating clear error or illegality.
An arbitral award can only be set aside under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 if the appellant establishes that the award is in conflict with the public policy of India, is p....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
