Back
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
Manoj Krishan Ahuja – Appellant
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. quashing of fir process (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. arguments against fir and investigation validity (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. historical and legislative background of pc&pndt act (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 4. interpretation of investigation procedures under pc&pndt act (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 44 , 49 , 50 , 52 , 56 , 57) |
| 5. court's final directions and conclusions (Para 102 , 103 , 104 , 107 , 110 , 112) |
JUDGMENT :
Swarana Kanta Sharma, J.
| Index to the Judgment | |
| FACTUAL BACKGROUND | 3 |
| SUMMARY OF ARGUMENTS | 6 |
| THE HISTORIC BACKDROP | 9 |
| ISSUES BEFORE THIS COURT | 12 |
| I. Cognizance of Offences under Section 28 | 12 |
| II. Is Police Investigation permissible under PC&PNDT Act? | 17 |
| III. Quashing of FIR in a case under PC&PNDT Act | 23 |
| OBSERVATIONS OF THE COURT APROPOS THE NEED TO CLARIFY CERTAIN PROVISIONS AND PROCEDURES UNDER THE ACT | 29 |
| I. Joint Endeavour of Judiciary, Legislature and Executive to achieve Object of the Act | 30 |
| II. Impact | |
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
